Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 leads Llama 4 Scout on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.0 to 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout costs 1.6x less per output token ($0.50 vs $0.775 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 22 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 4 ScoutMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
24.9
Output $/M
$0.50
0
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.775
22
vs boards won of 22 shared

Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($0.50 vs $0.775 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
22
Llama 4 Scout only
60
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 only
2
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 4 Scout not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 77.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: Llama 4 Scout 14.0 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 91.0, 77.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 4 Scout $0.50 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 $0.775 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Llama 4 Scout takes 1.31M tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 4 ScoutBarsQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning04
Math02
Knowledge01
Web design05
General04
All shared boards022
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
SWE-bench Verified9.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
AA Coding Index8.2Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)29.9%78.8%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SciCode21.3%41.4%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)1.5%15.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
WeirdMLNot measured38.7%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: coding1286Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1286Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.512.0Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Epoch Capabilities Index129.6Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Agentic Index0.5Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
τ²-Bench Telecom15.5%53.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)28.1%52.1%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond47.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)58.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.7%79.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%15.9%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)51.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
ARC-AGI0.5%11.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
ARC-AGI-20.0%1.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: hard prompts1266Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: expert1235Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1293Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1125Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: homework1148Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark36.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AIME19.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MGSM (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
AA Math Index14.091.0Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.0%91.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
OTIS Mock AIME7.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH level 562.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: math1287Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1286Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro69.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)72.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)55.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedQA (Vals AI)50.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedCode (Vals AI)23.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.2%84.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: science1278Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1275Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1285Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1257Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Web design benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites7501058Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Design Arena: UI components765963Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Design Arena: game dev772951Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Design Arena: data viz8961070Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Design Arena: 3DNot measured994Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: all code categories7891038Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
General benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)34.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)50.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
IFBench39.5%51.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)27.7%72.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
DTBench57.9%78.4%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMCA12.0%23.5%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Fiction.LiveBench36.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text1279Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1248Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1249Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision1118Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: English1304Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: non-English1252Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1255Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: German1273Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1206Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: Korean1207Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: French1283Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1278Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: Russian1263Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: Polish1265Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1280Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1265Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1269Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1242Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: English1143Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1106Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1117Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: humor1102Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1126Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0005Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.010Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0096Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.040Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.037Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SpecificationMeta Llama 4 ScoutQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
MakerMeta LlamaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 5, 2025July 21, 2025
Context window1.31M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.175$0.145
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.775
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved task$1.276Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 4 Scout better than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($0.50 vs $0.775 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.175 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.145 and $0.775. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Scout only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Llama 4 Scout, with 1.31M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

22 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 4 Scout's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next