Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Llama 4 Scout costs 2.0x less per output token than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct ($0.50 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 4 ScoutMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
24.9
Output $/M
$0.50
3
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
1
vs boards won of 4 shared

Llama 4 Scout or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $1.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 128K tokens).

Shared results
4
Llama 4 Scout only
78
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct only
2
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 4 Scout not benchmarked, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 2.2 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Vision: English: Llama 4 Scout 1143 against Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct 1115, 4.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 4 Scout $0.50 against Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Llama 4 Scout takes 1.31M tokens, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 4 ScoutBarsQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructTies
Reasoning10
General21
All shared boards31
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
SWE-bench Verified9.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
AA Coding Index8.2Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)29.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
SciCode21.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)1.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: coding1286Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1286Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.5Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Epoch Capabilities Index129.6Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index0.5Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
τ²-Bench Telecom15.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
OSWorldNot measured5.0%Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)28.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond47.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)58.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)51.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
ARC-AGI0.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1266Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: expert1235Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1293Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1125Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: homework1148Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark36.9%36.0%Llama 4 Scout
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
AIME19.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MGSM (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
AA Math Index14.0Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
OTIS Mock AIME7.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH level 562.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: math1287Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1286Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro69.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)72.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)55.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedQA (Vals AI)50.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedCode (Vals AI)23.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
GeoBenchNot measured62.0%Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1278Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1275Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1285Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1257Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites750Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: UI components765Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: game dev772Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: data viz896Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: all code categories789Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
General benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)34.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)50.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
IFBench39.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)27.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
DTBench57.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMCA12.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Fiction.LiveBench36.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text1279Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1248Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1249Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision11181107Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Text: English1304Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: non-English1252Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1255Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: German1273Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1206Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: Korean1207Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: French1283Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1278Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: Russian1263Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: Polish1265Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1280Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1265Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1269Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1242Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: English11431115Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Vision: Chinese11061107Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Vision: reading text1117Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: humor1102Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1126Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct$0.0013Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.010Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct$0.043Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.040Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct$0.170Exceeds the context window

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
SpecificationMeta Llama 4 ScoutQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
MakerMeta LlamaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 5, 2025February 1, 2025
Context window1.31M128K
Input $/Mtok$0.175$0.80
Output $/Mtok$0.50$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved task$1.276Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 4 Scout better than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $1.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.175 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs $0.80 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Scout only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout, with 1.31M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 4 Scout's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next