Llama 4 Scout vs MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax M2.5 leads Llama 4 Scout on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.8 to 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout costs 2.4x less per output token ($0.50 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 53 benchmarks have a result for both.
Llama 4 Scout or MiniMax M2.5: which to pick
Only MiniMax M2.5 has a coding score, 37.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 4 Scout has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 2.4x cheaper ($0.50 vs $1.20 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 205K tokens).
- Shared results
- 53
- Llama 4 Scout only
- 29
- MiniMax M2.5 only
- 18
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only MiniMax M2.5 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax M2.5 leads, 22.8 against 6.5.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Llama 4 Scout has a AA Agentic Index result, 0.5.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax M2.5 leads, 82.1% against 47.0%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax M2.5 leads, 88.8% against 19.0%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax M2.5 leads, 80.1% against 69.6%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax M2.5 leads, 1222 against 750.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout takes 1.31M tokens against 205K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout $0.0004, MiniMax M2.5 $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
MiniMax M2.5
Llama 4 Scout $1.276, MiniMax M2.5 $0.62.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Llama 4 Scout not benchmarked, MiniMax M2.5 37.2 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 79.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- τ²-Bench Telecom: Llama 4 Scout 15.5% against MiniMax M2.5 95.3%, 79.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Llama 4 Scout $0.50 against MiniMax M2.5 $1.20 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
- Context window
- Llama 4 Scout takes 1.31M tokens, MiniMax M2.5 205K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Llama 4 Scout | Bars | MiniMax M2.5 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 5 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 9 | ||
| Math | 0 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 9 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 5 | ||
| General | 1 | 18 | ||
| All shared boards | 1 | 52 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | MiniMax M2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 9.1% | 75.8% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | Not measured | 68.3% | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1386 | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| AA Coding Index | 8.2 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 38.5% | 79.2% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 74.2% | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.8% | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 29.9% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| SciCode | 21.3% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 1.5% | 34.8% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 42.7% | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 618.2 | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1286 | 1380 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1286 | 1383 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1374 | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1414 | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA | Not measured | 10.3% | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| SWE Atlas: Refactoring | Not measured | 19.5% | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| SWE Atlas: Test Writing | Not measured | 18.6% | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | MiniMax M2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 6.5 | 22.8 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.6 | 146.6 | MiniMax M2.5 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | MiniMax M2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 0.5 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 15.5% | 95.3% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | -$23 | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 28.1% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index09
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | MiniMax M2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.0% | 82.1% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 58.8% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 58.7% | 84.8% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.8% | 20.5% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 51.8% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| ARC-AGI | 0.5% | 63.7% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.0% | 4.9% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1266 | 1372 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1235 | 1378 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1293 | 1384 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1125 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1148 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 36.9% | 55.2% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | MiniMax M2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 19.0% | 88.8% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 79.2% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 88.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| AA Math Index | 14.0 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 14.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 7.8% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 4.0% | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| MATH level 5 | 62.3% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1287 | 1378 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1286 | 1378 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index09
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | MiniMax M2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 69.6% | 80.1% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 72.0% | 80.0% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 53.5% | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 46.8% | 59.6% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 55.2% | 68.2% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 57.8% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 50.9% | 92.5% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 23.3% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 75.2% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1278 | 1369 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1275 | 1357 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1285 | 1366 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1257 | 1356 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | MiniMax M2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 750 | 1222 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 765 | 1170 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 772 | 1176 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 896 | 1172 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1170 | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 789 | 1207 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1150 | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index118
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | MiniMax M2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 34.8% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 50.6% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| IFBench | 39.5% | 71.6% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 27.7% | 73.3% | MiniMax M2.5 |
| DTBench | 57.9% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMCA | 12.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 36.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| CL-bench | Not measured | 11.4% | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| CL-bench Life | Not measured | 6.3% | Only MiniMax M2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1359 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1248 | 1353 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1249 | 1331 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Vision | 1118 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1304 | 1380 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1252 | 1338 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1255 | 1393 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1273 | 1361 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1206 | 1171 | Llama 4 Scout |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1207 | 1233 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1283 | 1363 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1278 | 1353 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1263 | 1359 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1265 | 1334 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1280 | 1364 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1265 | 1366 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1269 | 1345 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1242 | 1329 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1143 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1106 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1117 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1102 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1126 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | MiniMax M2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Llama 4 Scout costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Llama 4 Scout costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Llama 4 Scout costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Meta Llama 4 Scout | MiniMax M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meta Llama | MiniMax |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | April 5, 2025 | February 12, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.31M | 205K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.175 | $0.30 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.50 | $1.20 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 37.2 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.276 | $0.62 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Llama 4 Scout better than MiniMax M2.5 for coding?
Only MiniMax M2.5 has a coding score, 37.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 4 Scout has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 2.4x cheaper ($0.50 vs $1.20 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 205K tokens).
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or MiniMax M2.5?
Llama 4 Scout costs $0.175 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2.5 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Llama 4 Scout costs $1.276 and MiniMax M2.5 $0.62.
Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Scout or MiniMax M2.5?
Llama 4 Scout, with 1.31M tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks is the Llama 4 Scout vs MiniMax M2.5 comparison based on?
53 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 4 Scout's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.