Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 4 Maverick vs Hunyuan A13B Instruct

Hunyuan A13B Instruct costs 1.8x less per output token than Llama 4 Maverick ($0.57 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Llama 4 MaverickMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
21.8
Output $/M
$1.00
Hunyuan A13B InstructTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.57
vs $1.00 vs $0.57 per 1M output tokens. Hunyuan A13B Instruct is 1.8x cheaper.

Llama 4 Maverick or Hunyuan A13B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 4 Maverick for a larger context window (524K against 131K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Llama 4 Maverick has results on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Verified and AA Coding Index; Hunyuan A13B Instruct has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 4 Maverick not benchmarked, Hunyuan A13B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Llama 4 Maverick $1.00 against Hunyuan A13B Instruct $0.57 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
Llama 4 Maverick takes 524K tokens, Hunyuan A13B Instruct 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
Aider polyglot15.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
SWE-bench Verified21.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Coding Index16.3Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)39.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
SciCode31.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
WeirdML24.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
ALE-Bench173.0Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: coding1301Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1299Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.3Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Epoch Capabilities Index132.2Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index0.6Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
τ²-Bench Telecom17.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond69.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)71.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)67.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
ARC-AGI4.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
SimpleBench27.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1281Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: expert1259Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1295Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1134Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: homework1164Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
AIME25.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)85.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Math Index19.3Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)19.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: math1299Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1295Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro79.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)49.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)58.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedQA (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedCode (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
GeoBench52.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: science1288Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1275Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1286Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1260Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites871Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: UI components897Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: game dev837Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: data viz882Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: 3D900Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: all code categories879Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31 boards measured
General benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)35.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)54.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
IFBench43.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)50.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
DTBench61.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMCA15.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Fiction.LiveBench46.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)62.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text1287Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1267Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1266Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision1142Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: English1303Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: non-English1269Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1277Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: German1291Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1206Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Korean1203Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: French1259Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1293Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Russian1286Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Polish1275Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1289Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1280Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1277Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1250Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: English1150Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1141Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1143Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: humor1100Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1099Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.0008Fits in one request
Hunyuan A13B Instruct$0.0004Fits in one request

Hunyuan A13B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.021Fits in one request
Hunyuan A13B Instruct$0.0087Fits in one request

Hunyuan A13B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.080Fits in one request
Hunyuan A13B Instruct$0.034Exceeds the context window

Hunyuan A13B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 4 Maverick and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
SpecificationMeta Llama 4 MaverickTencent Hunyuan A13B Instruct
MakerMeta LlamaTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 5, 2025July 8, 2025
Context window524K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.35$0.14
Output $/Mtok$1.00$0.57
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved task$1.491Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 4 Maverick better than Hunyuan A13B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Maverick for a larger context window (524K against 131K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Hunyuan A13B Instruct?

Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens; Hunyuan A13B Instruct costs $0.14 and $0.57. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Maverick only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Maverick or Hunyuan A13B Instruct?

Llama 4 Maverick, with 524K tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Llama 4 Maverick and Hunyuan A13B Instruct?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Llama 4 Maverick has results on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Verified and AA Coding Index; Hunyuan A13B Instruct has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next