Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 4 Maverick vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Llama 4 Maverick and Beam 1.0 501B A23B cost about the same per output token ($1.00 vs $1.10 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 25 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 4 MaverickMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
21.8
Output $/M
$1.00
0
R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
25
vs boards won of 25 shared

Llama 4 Maverick or Beam 1.0 501B A23B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 4 Maverick for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($1.00 vs $1.10 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
25
Llama 4 Maverick only
60
Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
3
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 4 Maverick not benchmarked, Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 47.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: Llama 4 Maverick 837 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1224, 48.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 4 Maverick $1.00 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.10 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Llama 4 Maverick takes 524K tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 4 MaverickBarsBeam 1.0 501B A23BTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
Web design02
General012
All shared boards025
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Aider polyglot15.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
SWE-bench Verified21.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1437Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
AA Coding Index16.3Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)39.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
SciCode31.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
WeirdML24.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
ALE-Bench173.0Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: coding13011473Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: software and IT12991461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1443Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1436Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.3Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Epoch Capabilities Index132.2Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Agentic Index0.6Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
τ²-Bench Telecom17.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
GPQA Diamond69.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)71.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)67.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
ARC-AGI4.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
SimpleBench27.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12811442Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: expert12591447Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12951451Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision: diagrams1134Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: homework1164Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AIME25.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)85.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Math Index19.3Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)19.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: math12991459Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: mathematical work12951475Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
MMLU Pro79.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)49.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)58.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedQA (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedCode (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
GeoBench52.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: science12881430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12751376Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: legal and government12861433Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: business and finance12601430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Design Arena: websites8711250Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: UI components896Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: game dev8371224Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: data viz882Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: 3D900Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: all code categories879Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
General benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)35.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)54.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
IFBench43.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)50.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
DTBench61.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMCA15.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Fiction.LiveBench46.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)62.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text12871425Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: instruction following12671430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: creative writing12661390Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision1142Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: English13031436Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: non-English12691413Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Chinese12771424Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: German1291Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1206Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Korean1203Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: French12591461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Spanish1293Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Russian12861412Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Polish1275Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12891414Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: longer queries12801429Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: writing and language12771400Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12501399Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision: English1150Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1141Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1143Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: humor1100Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1099Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.0008Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0009Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.021Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.021Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.080Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.081Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 4 Maverick and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SpecificationMeta Llama 4 MaverickReflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B
MakerMeta LlamaReflection
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 5, 2025October 16, 2026
Context window524K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.35$0.35
Output $/Mtok$1.00$1.10
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved task$1.491Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 4 Maverick better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Maverick for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($1.00 vs $1.10 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.35 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Maverick only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Maverick or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 4 Maverick vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 4 Maverick's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next