Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B leads Llama 4 Maverick on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 19.3 to 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick costs 1.3x less per output token ($1.00 vs $1.30 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 39 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 4 MaverickMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
21.8
Output $/M
$1.00
0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
53.5
Output $/M
$1.30
39
vs boards won of 39 shared

Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 4 Maverick for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($1.00 vs $1.30 per million) and a larger context window (524K against 262K tokens).

Shared results
39
Llama 4 Maverick only
46
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B only
6
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 4 Maverick not benchmarked, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 71.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Llama 4 Maverick 17.8% against Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 89.2%, 71.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 4 Maverick $1.00 against Qwen3.5-35B-A3B $1.30 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Llama 4 Maverick takes 524K tokens, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 4 MaverickBarsQwen3.5-35B-A3BTies
Coding04
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General021
All shared boards039
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
Aider polyglot15.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
SWE-bench Verified21.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1254Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
AA Coding Index16.3Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)39.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
SciCode31.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%26.5%Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
WeirdML24.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
ALE-Bench173.0221.8Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: coding13011410Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: software and IT12991415Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1238Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1301Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.319.3Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Epoch Capabilities Index132.2142.5Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
AA Agentic Index0.6Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
τ²-Bench Telecom17.8%89.2%Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$463Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond69.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)71.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)67.1%84.5%Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.9%21.0%Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured83.5%Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
ARC-AGI4.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
SimpleBench27.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12811400Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: expert12591408Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12951411Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Vision: diagrams1134Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: homework1164Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
AIME25.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)85.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Math Index19.3Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)19.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured70.0%Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: math12991404Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: mathematical work12951410Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
MMLU Pro79.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)49.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)58.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedQA (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedCode (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
GeoBench52.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: science12881413Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12751421Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: legal and government12861399Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: business and finance12601394Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites871Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: UI components896Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: game dev837Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: data viz882Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: 3D900Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: all code categories879Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index021
General benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)35.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)54.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
IFBench43.0%72.5%Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)50.0%72.0%Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
DTBench61.9%80.0%Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMCA15.9%29.5%Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Fiction.LiveBench46.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)62.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text12871395Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: instruction following12671379Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: creative writing12661347Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Vision1142Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: English13031407Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: non-English12691378Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: Chinese12771457Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: German12911367Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: Japanese12061326Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: Korean12031355Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: French12591412Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: Spanish12931390Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: Russian12861376Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: Polish12751385Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: multi-turn12891390Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: longer queries12801389Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: writing and language12771365Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12501347Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Vision: English1150Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1141Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1143Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: humor1100Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1099Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.0008Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.0008Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.021Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.012Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.080Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.045Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
SpecificationMeta Llama 4 MaverickQwen3.5-35B-A3B
MakerMeta LlamaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 5, 2025February 25, 2026
Context window524K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.35$0.1625
Output $/Mtok$1.00$1.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved task$1.491Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 4 Maverick better than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Maverick for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($1.00 vs $1.30 per million) and a larger context window (524K against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs $0.1625 and $1.30. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Maverick only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Llama 4 Maverick, with 524K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B comparison based on?

39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 4 Maverick's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next