Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 32B
Llama 4 Maverick leads Qwen3 32B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.3 to 7.3, and Qwen3 32B costs 2.5x less per output token ($0.40 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 41 benchmarks have a result for both.
Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3 32B: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Llama 4 Maverick for a larger context window (524K against 131K tokens) and work measured by Aider polyglot or LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 41
- Llama 4 Maverick only
- 44
- Qwen3 32B only
- 4
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick leads, 9.3 against 7.3.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Llama 4 Maverick has a AA Agentic Index result, 0.6.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Llama 4 Maverick has a GPQA Diamond result, 69.4%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Llama 4 Maverick has a AIME result, 25.2%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Llama 4 Maverick has a MMLU Pro result, 79.4%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Llama 4 Maverick has a Design Arena: websites result, 871.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick takes 524K tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3 32B
Llama 4 Maverick $0.0008, Qwen3 32B $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Llama 4 Maverick has the number, $1.491.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Llama 4 Maverick not benchmarked, Qwen3 32B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Math, 36.2 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- AA Math Index: Llama 4 Maverick 19.3 against Qwen3 32B 73.0, 53.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Llama 4 Maverick $1.00 against Qwen3 32B $0.40 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
- Context window
- Llama 4 Maverick takes 524K tokens, Qwen3 32B 131K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Llama 4 Maverick | Bars | Qwen3 32B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 5 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 2 | 4 | ||
| Math | 0 | 4 | ||
| Knowledge | 1 | 4 | ||
| General | 2 | 15 | ||
| All shared boards | 7 | 34 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index15
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 32B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | 15.6% | 40.0% | Qwen3 32B |
| SWE-bench Verified | 21.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| AA Coding Index | 16.3 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 47.3% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 39.7% | 54.6% | Qwen3 32B |
| SciCode | 31.7% | 36.0% | Qwen3 32B |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 6.8% | 3.0% | Llama 4 Maverick |
| WeirdML | 24.5% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| ALE-Bench | 173.0 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1301 | 1357 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1299 | 1366 | Qwen3 32B |
| Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 32B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 9.3 | 7.3 | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 132.2 | 138.4 | Qwen3 32B |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 32B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 0.6 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 17.8% | 29.8% | Qwen3 32B |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | Not measured | 48.7% | Only Qwen3 32B measured |
| BrowseComp-Plus | Not measured | 10.7% | Only Qwen3 32B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 32B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 69.4% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 71.7% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 67.1% | 66.8% | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.9% | 7.4% | Qwen3 32B |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 65.7% | Only Qwen3 32B measured |
| ARC-AGI | 4.4% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| SimpleBench | 27.7% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1281 | 1334 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1259 | 1362 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1295 | 1350 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1134 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1164 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 55.9% | 48.7% | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 32B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 25.2% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 85.2% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 92.4% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| AA Math Index | 19.3 | 73.0 | Qwen3 32B |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 19.3% | 73.0% | Qwen3 32B |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 66.9% | Only Qwen3 32B measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1299 | 1399 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1295 | 1420 | Qwen3 32B |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 32B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 79.4% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 77.8% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 49.7% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 66.6% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 58.5% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 43.3% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 36.5% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 80.9% | 79.8% | Llama 4 Maverick |
| GeoBench | 52.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1288 | 1372 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1275 | 1368 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1286 | 1324 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1260 | 1318 | Qwen3 32B |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 32B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 871 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 896 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 837 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 882 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 900 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 879 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index215
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 32B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 35.7% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 54.2% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| IFBench | 43.0% | 36.3% | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 50.0% | 0.0% | Llama 4 Maverick |
| DTBench | 61.9% | 67.5% | Qwen3 32B |
| LMCA | 15.9% | 17.3% | Qwen3 32B |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 46.2% | 74.2% | Qwen3 32B |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | 62.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LMArena Text | 1287 | 1340 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1267 | 1305 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1266 | 1297 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Vision | 1142 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1303 | 1359 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1269 | 1317 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1277 | 1357 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: German | 1291 | 1341 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1206 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1203 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1259 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1293 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1286 | 1311 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1275 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1289 | 1331 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1280 | 1327 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1277 | 1298 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1250 | 1279 | Qwen3 32B |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1150 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1141 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1143 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1100 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1099 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Maverick measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 32B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3 32B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3 32B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3 32B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Meta Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meta Llama | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | April 5, 2025 | April 28, 2025 |
| Context window | 524K | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.35 | $0.14 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.00 | $0.40 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.491 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Llama 4 Maverick better than Qwen3 32B for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Maverick for a larger context window (524K against 131K tokens) and work measured by Aider polyglot or LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3 32B?
Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 32B costs $0.14 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Maverick only.
Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3 32B?
Llama 4 Maverick, with 524K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 32B comparison based on?
41 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 4 Maverick's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 32B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.