Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 leads Llama 4 Maverick on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.0 to 9.3, and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs 1.3x less per output token ($0.775 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 23 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 4 MaverickMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
21.8
Output $/M
$1.00
0
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.775
23
vs boards won of 23 shared

Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 4 Maverick for a larger context window (524K against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or SciCode, where it leads.

Shared results
23
Llama 4 Maverick only
62
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 only
1
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 4 Maverick not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 71.7 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: Llama 4 Maverick 19.3 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 91.0, 71.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 4 Maverick $1.00 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 $0.775 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Llama 4 Maverick takes 524K tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 4 MaverickBarsQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning04
Math02
Knowledge01
Web design06
General04
All shared boards023
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Aider polyglot15.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
SWE-bench Verified21.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Coding Index16.3Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)39.7%78.8%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SciCode31.7%41.4%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%15.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
WeirdML24.5%38.7%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
ALE-Bench173.0Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: coding1301Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1299Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.312.0Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Epoch Capabilities Index132.2Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Agentic Index0.6Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
τ²-Bench Telecom17.8%53.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured52.1%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond69.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)71.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)67.1%79.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.9%15.9%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
ARC-AGI4.4%11.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
ARC-AGI-20.0%1.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SimpleBench27.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1281Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: expert1259Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1295Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1134Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: homework1164Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AIME25.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)85.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Math Index19.391.0Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)19.3%91.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: math1299Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1295Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro79.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)49.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)58.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedQA (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedCode (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%84.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
GeoBench52.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: science1288Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1275Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1286Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1260Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites8711058Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Design Arena: UI components897963Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Design Arena: game dev837951Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Design Arena: data viz8821070Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Design Arena: 3D900994Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Design Arena: all code categories8791038Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
General benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)35.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)54.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
IFBench43.0%51.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)50.0%72.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
DTBench61.9%78.4%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMCA15.9%23.5%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Fiction.LiveBench46.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)62.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text1287Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1267Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1266Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision1142Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: English1303Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: non-English1269Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1277Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: German1291Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1206Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Korean1203Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: French1259Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1293Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Russian1286Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Polish1275Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1289Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1280Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1277Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1250Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: English1150Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1141Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1143Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: humor1100Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1099Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.0008Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0005Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.021Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0096Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.080Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.037Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SpecificationMeta Llama 4 MaverickQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
MakerMeta LlamaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 5, 2025July 21, 2025
Context window524K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.35$0.145
Output $/Mtok$1.00$0.775
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved task$1.491Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 4 Maverick better than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Maverick for a larger context window (524K against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or SciCode, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.145 and $0.775. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Maverick only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Llama 4 Maverick, with 524K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

23 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 4 Maverick's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next