Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 4 Maverick vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Llama 4 Maverick leads Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.3 to 8.9, and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 4.5x less per output token ($0.22 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 42 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 4 MaverickMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
21.8
Output $/M
$1.00
5
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.22
37
vs boards won of 42 shared

Llama 4 Maverick or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 4 Maverick for a larger context window (524K against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
42
Llama 4 Maverick only
43
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only
0
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 4 Maverick not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 42.2 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: Llama 4 Maverick 19.3 against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 91.0, 71.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 4 Maverick $1.00 against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.22 per million output tokens, 4.5x apart.
Context window
Llama 4 Maverick takes 524K tokens, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 4 MaverickBarsNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BTies
Coding24
Intelligence10
Agentic work02
Reasoning05
Math04
Knowledge14
General118
All shared boards537
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index24
Coding benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Aider polyglot15.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
SWE-bench Verified21.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Coding Index16.314.4Llama 4 Maverick
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)39.7%74.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
SciCode31.7%30.6%Llama 4 Maverick
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%13.6%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
WeirdML24.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
ALE-Bench173.0Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: coding13011378Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: software and IT12991382Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.38.9Llama 4 Maverick
Epoch Capabilities Index132.2Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Agentic Index0.61.0Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
τ²-Bench Telecom17.8%40.9%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond69.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)71.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)67.1%75.7%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.9%11.4%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
ARC-AGI4.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
SimpleBench27.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12801348Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: expert12591356Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12951376Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Vision: diagrams1134Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: homework1164Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AIME25.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)85.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Math Index19.391.0Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)19.3%91.0%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: math12991371Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: mathematical work12951375Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro79.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)49.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)58.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedQA (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedCode (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%79.4%Llama 4 Maverick
GeoBench52.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: science12881353Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12751349Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: legal and government12861341Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: business and finance12601345Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites871Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: UI components897Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: game dev837Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: data viz882Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: 3D901Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: all code categories879Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index118
General benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)35.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)54.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
IFBench43.0%71.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)50.0%38.0%Llama 4 Maverick
DTBench61.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMCA15.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Fiction.LiveBench46.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)62.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text12871348Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: instruction following12671304Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: creative writing12661270Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Vision1142Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: English13021378Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: non-English12691320Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Chinese12771383Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: German12911348Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Japanese12061269Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Korean12031269Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: French12591396Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Spanish12931376Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Russian12861304Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Polish12751302Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: multi-turn12891319Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: longer queries12791300Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: writing and language12771284Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12501294Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Vision: English1150Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1141Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1143Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: humor1100Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1099Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.0008Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0002Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.021Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0034Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.080Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.013Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 4 Maverick and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
SpecificationMeta Llama 4 MaverickNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
MakerMeta LlamaNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 5, 2025December 14, 2025
Context window524K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.35$0.055
Output $/Mtok$1.00$0.22
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved task$1.491Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 4 Maverick better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Maverick for a larger context window (524K against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.055 and $0.22. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Maverick only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Maverick or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Llama 4 Maverick, with 524K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 4 Maverick vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B comparison based on?

42 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Llama 4 Maverick's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next