Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs o3

Updated October 21, 2026. 48 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Llama 3.3 70B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
7.7
Output $/M
$0.72
0
o3OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
20.2
Output $/M
$8.00
48
vs boards won of 48 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has the edge where output tokens cost 11.1x less, and where what matters is LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
48
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct only
3
o3 only
49
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct not benchmarked, o3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 58.2 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run): Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 7.7% against o3 88.3%, 80.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct $0.72 against o3 $8.00 per million output tokens, 11.1x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct takes 131K tokens, o3 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.3 70B InstructBarso3Ties
Coding05
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning07
Math06
Knowledge05
General022
All shared boards048
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B Instructo3Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured81.3%Only o3 measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured58.4%Only o3 measured
SWE-bench MultimodalNot measured36.0%Only o3 measured
AA Coding Index11.9Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.9%Only o3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%80.8%o3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.0%37.1%o3
GSO-BenchNot measured8.8%Only o3 measured
WeirdML14.4%52.4%o3
ALE-BenchNot measured933.5Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: coding12681407o3
LMArena Text: software and IT12731415o3
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B Instructo3Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.720.2o3
Epoch Capabilities Index127.3146.7o3
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B Instructo3Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom26.6%80.7%o3
METR time horizonsNot measured65.4%Only o3 measured
GDPvalNot measured30.8%Only o3 measured
BALROG23.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
DeepResearch BenchNot measured45.2%Only o3 measured
OSWorldNot measured23.0%Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B Instructo3Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured84.1%Only o3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only o3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.8%82.7%o3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.6%20.1%o3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.4%81.8%o3
ARC-AGINot measured60.8%Only o3 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured6.5%Only o3 measured
SimpleBench19.9%53.1%o3
Chess puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only o3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured29.0%Only o3 measured
VPCTNot measured52.0%Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12571402o3
LMArena Text: expert12251402o3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12771411o3
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1220Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1234Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B Instructo3Leader
AIMENot measured85.3%Only o3 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured94.6%Only o3 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured91.8%Only o3 measured
AA Math Index7.788.3o3
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.7%88.3%o3
OTIS Mock AIME5.1%84.4%o3
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured33.3%Only o3 measured
MATH level 541.6%97.8%o3
LMArena Text: math12671426o3
LMArena Text: mathematical work12671423o3
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B Instructo3Leader
MMLU ProNot measured85.6%Only o3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.8%Only o3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only o3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.6%Only o3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.7%Only o3 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.1%Only o3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured47.3%Only o3 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.3%85.3%o3
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured49.4%Only o3 measured
MMLU86.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
GeoBenchNot measured74.0%Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: science12841429o3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12751448o3
LMArena Text: legal and government12841428o3
LMArena Text: business and finance12431393o3
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B Instructo3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1036Only o3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1017Only o3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1034Only o3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1200Only o3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1020Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index022
General benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B Instructo3Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured41.8%Only o3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured76.7%Only o3 measured
IFBench47.1%71.4%o3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)15.7%74.7%o3
DTBench59.5%84.8%o3
LMCA17.5%39.7%o3
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%88.9%o3
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured83.9%Only o3 measured
CL-benchNot measured17.8%Only o3 measured
LMArena Text12741410o3
LMArena Text: instruction following12421368o3
LMArena Text: creative writing12501359o3
LMArena VisionNot measured1214Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: English13031417o3
LMArena Text: non-English12361401o3
LMArena Text: Chinese12171437o3
LMArena Text: German12511420o3
LMArena Text: Japanese11501403o3
LMArena Text: Korean11421370o3
LMArena Text: French12821430o3
LMArena Text: Spanish12691395o3
LMArena Text: Russian12521406o3
LMArena Text: Polish12591438o3
LMArena Text: multi-turn12801405o3
LMArena Text: longer queries12551372o3
LMArena Text: writing and language12551372o3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12411373o3
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1221Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1237Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1218Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1222Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1210Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1234Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1201Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B Instructo3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.0008Fits in one request
o3$0.0060Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.025Fits in one request
o3$0.124Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.097Exceeds the context window
o3$0.480Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and o3
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.3 70B InstructOpenAI o3
MakerMeta LlamaOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 6, 2024April 16, 2025
Context window131K200K
Input $/Mtok$0.45$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.72$8.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.571
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better than o3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has the edge where output tokens cost 11.1x less, and where what matters is LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or o3?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs $0.45 per million input tokens and $0.72 per million output tokens; o3 costs $2.00 and $8.00. Cost per solved task is known for o3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or o3?

o3, with 200K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs o3 comparison based on?

48 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and o3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next