Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2 0711 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Kimi K2 0711 leads Llama 4 Maverick on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.7 to 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick costs 2.3x less per output token ($1.00 vs $2.30 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.

Kimi K2 0711Moonshot AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.30
30
Llama 4 MaverickMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
21.8
Output $/M
$1.00
4
vs boards won of 34 shared

Kimi K2 0711 or Llama 4 Maverick: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Kimi K2 0711 for work measured by SimpleBench or MGSM (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
34
Kimi K2 0711 only
3
Llama 4 Maverick only
51
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2 0711 not benchmarked, Llama 4 Maverick not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 43.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
SWE-bench Verified: Kimi K2 0711 71.2% against Llama 4 Maverick 21.0%, 50.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2 0711 $2.30 against Llama 4 Maverick $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
Kimi K2 0711 takes 131K tokens, Llama 4 Maverick 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2 0711BarsLlama 4 MaverickTies
Coding60
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning41
Math41
Knowledge51
Web design50
General31
All shared boards304
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Aider polyglot59.1%15.6%Kimi K2 0711
SWE-bench Verified71.2%21.0%Kimi K2 0711
AA Coding IndexNot measured16.3Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)70.5%47.3%Kimi K2 0711
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)55.6%39.7%Kimi K2 0711
SciCodeNot measured31.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%6.8%Kimi K2 0711
Terminal-Bench27.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
GSO-Bench4.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
WeirdML39.4%24.5%Kimi K2 0711
ALE-BenchNot measured173.0Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1301Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1299Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.79.3Kimi K2 0711
Epoch Capabilities Index140.0132.2Kimi K2 0711
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.6Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
τ²-Bench Telecom61.1%17.8%Kimi K2 0711
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Llama 4 MaverickLeader
GPQA Diamond71.5%69.4%Kimi K2 0711
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured71.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.6%67.1%Kimi K2 0711
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.4%4.9%Kimi K2 0711
ARC-AGINot measured4.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured0.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SimpleBench26.3%27.7%Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1281Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1259Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1295Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1134Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1164Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark64.4%55.9%Kimi K2 0711
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AIME62.7%25.2%Kimi K2 0711
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.2%85.2%Kimi K2 0711
MGSM (Vals AI)91.0%92.4%Llama 4 Maverick
AA Math Index57.019.3Kimi K2 0711
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)57.0%19.3%Kimi K2 0711
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1299Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1295Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index51
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Llama 4 MaverickLeader
MMLU Pro79.4%79.4%Llama 4 Maverick
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.5%77.8%Kimi K2 0711
CorpFin (Vals AI)50.4%49.7%Kimi K2 0711
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.2%66.6%Kimi K2 0711
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured58.5%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedQA (Vals AI)84.0%43.3%Kimi K2 0711
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured36.5%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)82.4%80.9%Kimi K2 0711
GeoBenchNot measured52.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1288Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1275Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1286Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1260Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Design Arena: websites1050871Kimi K2 0711
Design Arena: UI components1027896Kimi K2 0711
Design Arena: game dev973837Kimi K2 0711
Design Arena: data viz1018882Kimi K2 0711
Design Arena: 3DNot measured900Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: all code categories1033879Kimi K2 0711
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
General benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Llama 4 MaverickLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured35.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured54.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
IFBench41.5%43.0%Llama 4 Maverick
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)53.0%50.0%Kimi K2 0711
DTBenchNot measured61.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMCANot measured15.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%46.2%Kimi K2 0711
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)85.6%62.0%Kimi K2 0711
CL-bench11.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1287Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1267Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1266Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1142Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1303Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1269Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1277Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1291Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1206Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1203Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1259Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1293Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1286Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1275Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1289Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1280Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1277Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1250Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1150Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1141Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1143Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1100Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1099Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2 0711$0.0017Fits in one request
Llama 4 Maverick$0.0008Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2 0711$0.035Fits in one request
Llama 4 Maverick$0.021Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2 0711$0.137Exceeds the context window
Llama 4 Maverick$0.080Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2 0711 and Llama 4 Maverick
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2 0711Meta Llama 4 Maverick
MakerMoonshot AIMeta Llama
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 11, 2025April 5, 2025
Context window131K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.57$0.35
Output $/Mtok$2.30$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.491
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2 0711 better than Llama 4 Maverick for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Kimi K2 0711 for work measured by SimpleBench or MGSM (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 0711 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Kimi K2 0711 costs $0.57 per million input tokens and $2.30 per million output tokens; Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.35 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Maverick only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2 0711 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick, with 524K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2 0711 vs Llama 4 Maverick comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Kimi K2 0711's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Llama 4 Maverick's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next