Ling 3.1 Flash vs o3
Ling 3.1 Flash leads o3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 41.1 to 20.2, and Ling 3.1 Flash costs 35.6x less per output token ($0.225 vs $8.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.
Ling 3.1 Flash or o3: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Ling 3.1 Flash for output tokens 35.6x cheaper ($0.225 vs $8.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 200K tokens).
- Shared results
- 3
- Ling 3.1 Flash only
- 1
- o3 only
- 99
- Like-for-like categories
- 3 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Ling 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash leads, 41.1 against 20.2.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only o3 has a GPQA Diamond result, 84.1%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only o3 has a AIME result, 85.3%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only o3 has a MMLU Pro result, 85.6%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only o3 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1036.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Ling 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash takes 262K tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash $0.0002, o3 $0.0060 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only o3 has the number, $0.571.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Ling 3.1 Flash not benchmarked, o3 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Intelligence, 20.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- AA Intelligence Index: Ling 3.1 Flash 41.1 against o3 20.2, 20.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Ling 3.1 Flash $0.225 against o3 $8.00 per million output tokens, 35.6x apart.
- Context window
- Ling 3.1 Flash takes 262K tokens, o3 200K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Ling 3.1 Flash | Bars | o3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 1 | 0 | ||
| General | 1 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 3 | 0 |
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | o3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | Not measured | 81.3% | Only o3 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 58.4% | Only o3 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal | Not measured | 36.0% | Only o3 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 83.9% | Only o3 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 80.8% | Only o3 measured |
| SciCode | 54.1% | Not measured | Only Ling 3.1 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 37.1% | Only o3 measured |
| GSO-Bench | Not measured | 8.8% | Only o3 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 52.4% | Only o3 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 933.5 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1407 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1415 | Only o3 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 9.2% | Only o3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | o3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 41.1 | 20.2 | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 146.7 | Only o3 measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | o3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 80.7% | Only o3 measured |
| METR time horizons | Not measured | 65.4% | Only o3 measured |
| GDPval | Not measured | 30.8% | Only o3 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | Not measured | 45.2% | Only o3 measured |
| OSWorld | Not measured | 23.0% | Only o3 measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | Not measured | 63.0% | Only o3 measured |
| BrowseComp-Plus | Not measured | 65.9% | Only o3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | o3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 84.1% | Only o3 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 80.4% | Only o3 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 82.7% | Only o3 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 39.4% | 20.1% | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 81.8% | Only o3 measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 60.8% | Only o3 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 6.5% | Only o3 measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 53.1% | Only o3 measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 37.0% | Only o3 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 29.0% | Only o3 measured |
| VPCT | Not measured | 52.0% | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1402 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1402 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1411 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1220 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1234 | Only o3 measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 67.6% | Only o3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | o3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 85.3% | Only o3 measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 94.6% | Only o3 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | Not measured | 91.8% | Only o3 measured |
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 88.3 | Only o3 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 88.3% | Only o3 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 84.4% | Only o3 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 33.3% | Only o3 measured |
| MATH level 5 | Not measured | 97.8% | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1426 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1423 | Only o3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | o3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 85.6% | Only o3 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 83.8% | Only o3 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 59.7% | Only o3 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 74.6% | Only o3 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 65.7% | Only o3 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | Not measured | 96.1% | Only o3 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.3% | Only o3 measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 85.3% | Only o3 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 49.4% | Only o3 measured |
| GeoBench | Not measured | 74.0% | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1429 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1448 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1428 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1393 | Only o3 measured |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | Not measured | 44.4% | Only o3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | o3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1036 | Only o3 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1017 | Only o3 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1034 | Only o3 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1200 | Only o3 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1020 | Only o3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | o3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 41.8% | Only o3 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 76.7% | Only o3 measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 71.4% | Only o3 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 83.0% | 74.7% | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| DTBench | Not measured | 84.8% | Only o3 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 39.7% | Only o3 measured |
| Fiction.LiveBench | Not measured | 88.9% | Only o3 measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | Not measured | 83.9% | Only o3 measured |
| CL-bench | Not measured | 17.8% | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1410 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1368 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1359 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1214 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1417 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1401 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1437 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1420 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1403 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1370 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1430 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1395 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1406 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1438 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1405 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1372 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1372 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1373 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1221 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1237 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1218 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1222 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | Not measured | 1210 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1234 | Only o3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1201 | Only o3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | o3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash | OpenAI o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | inclusionAI | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | October 2, 2026 | April 16, 2025 |
| Context window | 262K | 200K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.075 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.225 | $8.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.571 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Ling 3.1 Flash better than o3 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ling 3.1 Flash for output tokens 35.6x cheaper ($0.225 vs $8.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 200K tokens).
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.1 Flash or o3?
Ling 3.1 Flash costs $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.225 per million output tokens; o3 costs $2.00 and $8.00. Cost per solved task is known for o3 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Ling 3.1 Flash or o3?
Ling 3.1 Flash, with 262K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks is the Ling 3.1 Flash vs o3 comparison based on?
3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Ling 3.1 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and o3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.