Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mercury 2.5 vs Hy3

Mercury 2.5 costs 3.5x less per output token than Hy3 ($0.15 vs $0.528 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mercury 2.5Inception
Coding
1.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.15
0
Hy3Tencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.528
4
vs boards won of 4 shared

Mercury 2.5 or Hy3: which to pick

Only Mercury 2.5 has a coding score, 1.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Hy3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Hy3 for a larger context window (262K against 260K tokens) and work measured by SciCode or ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Shared results
4
Mercury 2.5 only
18
Hy3 only
40
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mercury 2.5 1.6 from 2 benchmarks, Hy3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 21.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): Mercury 2.5 11.8% against Hy3 33.5%, 21.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mercury 2.5 $0.15 against Hy3 $0.528 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window
Mercury 2.5 takes 260K tokens, Hy3 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMercury 2.5BarsHy3Ties
Coding02
Reasoning01
General01
All shared boards04
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and Hy3
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Hy3Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1507Only Hy3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)3.7%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)4.5%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)2.4%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)34.5%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)18.1%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)45.5%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
SciCode38.5%48.6%Hy3
ALE-Bench301.6838.6Hy3
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1466Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1463Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1511Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1487Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and Hy3
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Hy3Leader
AA Intelligence Index12.3Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and Hy3
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Hy3Leader
Finance Agent (Vals AI)18.9%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)8.8%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and Hy3
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Hy3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.7%Only Hy3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)11.8%33.5%Hy3
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1461Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1455Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and Hy3
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Hy3Leader
ProofBench3.0%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1473Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1482Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and Hy3
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Hy3Leader
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)31.3%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1452Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1422Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1424Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and Hy3
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Hy3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1204Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1208Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1164Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1232Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1227Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1200Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1152Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and Hy3
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Hy3Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)45.3%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)55.1%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)71.7%79.0%Hy3
LMArena TextNot measured1438Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1426Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1403Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1448Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1426Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1485Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1449Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1397Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1396Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1456Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1432Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1436Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1442Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1414Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1400Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and Hy3
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Hy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mercury 2.5$0.0001Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0004Fits in one request

Mercury 2.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mercury 2.5$0.0024Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0082Fits in one request

Mercury 2.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mercury 2.5$0.0095Fits in one request
Hy3$0.032Fits in one request

Mercury 2.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mercury 2.5 and Hy3
SpecificationInception Mercury 2.5Tencent Hy3
MakerInceptionTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 8, 2026July 6, 2026
Context window260K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.04$0.132
Output $/Mtok$0.15$0.528
Coding index1.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mercury 2.5 better than Hy3 for coding?

Only Mercury 2.5 has a coding score, 1.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Hy3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Hy3 for a larger context window (262K against 260K tokens) and work measured by SciCode or ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mercury 2.5 or Hy3?

Mercury 2.5 costs $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Hy3 costs $0.132 and $0.528. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mercury 2.5 or Hy3?

Hy3, with 262K tokens against 260K.

How many benchmarks is the Mercury 2.5 vs Hy3 comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Mercury 2.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Hy3's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next