Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Granite 4.2 8B vs Llama 4 Maverick

Granite 4.2 8B leads Llama 4 Maverick on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.1 to 9.3, and Granite 4.2 8B costs 5.0x less per output token ($0.20 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 27 benchmarks have a result for both.

Granite 4.2 8BIBM Granite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
21
Llama 4 MaverickMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
21.8
Output $/M
$1.00
6
vs boards won of 27 shared

Granite 4.2 8B or Llama 4 Maverick: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $1.00 per million) and work measured by SciCode or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
27
Granite 4.2 8B only
0
Llama 4 Maverick only
58
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Granite 4.2 8B not benchmarked, Llama 4 Maverick not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 9.2 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: expert: Granite 4.2 8B 1386 against Llama 4 Maverick 1259, 21.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Granite 4.2 8B $0.20 against Llama 4 Maverick $1.00 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Granite 4.2 8B takes 131K tokens, Llama 4 Maverick 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGranite 4.2 8BBarsLlama 4 MaverickTies
Coding31
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning41
Knowledge40
General84
All shared boards216
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index31
Coding benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 4 MaverickLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured15.6%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured21.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Coding Index22.416.3Granite 4.2 8B
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured47.3%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SciCode31.5%31.7%Llama 4 Maverick
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.8%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
WeirdMLNot measured24.5%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
ALE-BenchNot measured173.0Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: coding13781301Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: software and IT13671299Granite 4.2 8B
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 4 MaverickLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.19.3Granite 4.2 8B
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured132.2Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 4 MaverickLeader
AA Agentic Index1.30.6Granite 4.2 8B
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured17.8%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Reasoning benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 4 MaverickLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured69.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured71.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)63.1%67.1%Llama 4 Maverick
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)9.7%4.9%Granite 4.2 8B
ARC-AGINot measured4.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured0.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SimpleBenchNot measured27.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13271281Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: expert13861259Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13451295Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1134Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1164Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured55.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 4 MaverickLeader
AIMENot measured25.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured85.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured92.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Math IndexNot measured19.3Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured19.3%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1299Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1295Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 4 MaverickLeader
MMLU ProNot measured79.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured77.8%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured49.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured66.6%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured58.5%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured36.5%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
GeoBenchNot measured52.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: science13361288Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13361275Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: legal and government13271286Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: business and finance13221260Granite 4.2 8B
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 4 MaverickLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured871Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured897Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured837Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured882Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured900Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured879Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index84
General benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 4 MaverickLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured35.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured54.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
IFBenchNot measured43.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)45.0%50.0%Llama 4 Maverick
DTBenchNot measured61.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMCANot measured15.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured46.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured62.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text13191287Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: instruction following13001267Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: creative writing12361266Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena VisionNot measured1142Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: English13371303Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: non-English13011269Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: Chinese13671277Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1291Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1206Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1203Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1259Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1293Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Russian12821286Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1275Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13011289Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: longer queries13251280Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: writing and language12691277Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12711250Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1150Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1141Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1143Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1100Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1099Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 4 MaverickLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0002Fits in one request
Llama 4 Maverick$0.0008Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0046Fits in one request
Llama 4 Maverick$0.021Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.018Exceeds the context window
Llama 4 Maverick$0.080Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Granite 4.2 8B and Llama 4 Maverick
SpecificationIBM Granite 4.2 8BMeta Llama 4 Maverick
MakerIBM GraniteMeta Llama
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 31, 2026April 5, 2025
Context window131K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.08$0.35
Output $/Mtok$0.20$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.491
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Llama 4 Maverick for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $1.00 per million) and work measured by SciCode or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Llama 4 Maverick?

Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.35 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Maverick only.

Which has the bigger context window, Granite 4.2 8B or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick, with 524K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Granite 4.2 8B vs Llama 4 Maverick comparison based on?

27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Granite 4.2 8B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Llama 4 Maverick's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next