Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o vs Muse Spark Open

Updated October 21, 2026. 5 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4oOpenAI
Coding
38.8
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
62.1
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.25
5
vs boards won of 5 shared

Decision reading

GPT-4o scores 38.8 and Muse Spark Open 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.

Pick Muse Spark Open when output tokens cost 2.4x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 128K tokens.

Shared results
5
GPT-4o only
21
Muse Spark Open only
21
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o 38.8 from 1 benchmark, Muse Spark Open 62.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 54.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: websites: GPT-4o 831 against Muse Spark Open 1311, 60.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o $10.00 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o takes 128K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4oBarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Reasoning02
Web design02
General01
All shared boards05
CodingDirectional onlyFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index15 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark OpenLeader
SWE-bench Verified38.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Lite38.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench (full test set)18.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Multimodal30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1528Only Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)30.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SciCodeNot measured58.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1590.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1529Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1495Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark OpenLeader
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured155.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
τ²-Bench Telecom25.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GDPval9.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)54.3%89.0%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.4%43.9%Muse Spark Open
ARC-AGI4.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Math Index6.0Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)6.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark OpenLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
MMLU88.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websites8311311Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: UI components885Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: game dev9061290Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: data viz858Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: 3D869Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: all code categories861Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
IFBench34.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)49.3%78.3%Muse Spark Open
DTBench64.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LMCA16.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o$0.0075Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.155Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.600Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4oMeta Muse Spark Open
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 13, 2024October 15, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$1.25
Output $/Mtok$10.00$4.25
Coding index38.862.1
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

GPT-4o scores 38.8 and Muse Spark Open 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick Muse Spark Open when output tokens cost 2.4x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 128K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Muse Spark Open?

GPT-4o costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Muse Spark Open's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next