Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Muse Spark Open

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
3.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
62.1
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.25
0
vs No board has a result for both

Decision reading

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) scores 3.6 and Muse Spark Open 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.

Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 7.1x less; pick Muse Spark Open when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 128K tokens.

Shared results
0
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
46
Muse Spark Open only
26
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 3.6 from 1 benchmark, Muse Spark Open 62.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 7.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) takes 128K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingDirectional onlyFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark OpenLeader
Aider polyglot3.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1528Only Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
SciCodeNot measured58.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
WeirdML11.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1590.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena Text: coding1290Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1291Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1529Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1495Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark OpenLeader
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured155.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
BALROG17.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured43.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)37.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
SimpleBench10.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Chess puzzles3.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Mystery game puzzles12.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
VPCT34.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: expert1234Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark OpenLeader
OTIS Mock AIME6.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MATH level 552.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: math1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1271Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark OpenLeader
SimpleQA Verified8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MMLU76.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBench64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: science1286Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1282Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1305Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1265Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1311Only Muse Spark Open measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1290Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured78.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)67.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text1286Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1258Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1268Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision1066Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: English1301Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1266Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1265Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: German1272Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1216Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1195Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: French1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1276Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1275Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Polish1244Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1285Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1289Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1282Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1253Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: English1072Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1033Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Meta Muse Spark Open
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024October 15, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.60$4.25
Coding index3.662.1
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) scores 3.6 and Muse Spark Open 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 7.1x less; pick Muse Spark Open when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 128K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Muse Spark Open?

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Muse Spark Open's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next