Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs GPT-5.1

Updated October 21, 2026. 39 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Replace GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) Replace GPT-5.1
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
3.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
GPT-5.1OpenAI
Coding
53.3
Overall
24.7
Output $/M
$10.00
39
vs boards won of 39 shared

Decision reading

Pick GPT-5.1 for coding: it scores 53.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 3.6 for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18).

Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 16.7x less.

Model AGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI3.6/1001 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BGPT-5.1OpenAI53.3/1002 independent benchmarks$1.02 per solved task
Shared results
39
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
7
GPT-5.1 only
61
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 3.6 from 1 benchmark, GPT-5.1 53.3 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 47.0 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 6.9% against GPT-5.1 88.6%, 81.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 against GPT-5.1 $10.00 per million output tokens, 16.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) takes 128K tokens, GPT-5.1 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)BarsGPT-5.1Ties
Coding03
Reasoning08
Math03
Knowledge05
General020
All shared boards039
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1Leader
Aider polyglot3.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured66.0%Only GPT-5.1 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1396Only GPT-5.1 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured49.4Only GPT-5.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.5%Only GPT-5.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured69.8%Only GPT-5.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured24.6%Only GPT-5.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured86.8%Only GPT-5.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured45.5%Only GPT-5.1 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured47.6%Only GPT-5.1 measured
GSO-BenchNot measured13.7%Only GPT-5.1 measured
WeirdML11.8%60.8%GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: coding12901453GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: software and IT12911454GPT-5.1
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1307Only GPT-5.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1405Only GPT-5.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1421Only GPT-5.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured24.7Only GPT-5.1 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured149.8Only GPT-5.1 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured81.9%Only GPT-5.1 measured
BALROG17.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
DeepResearch BenchNot measured42.8%Only GPT-5.1 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$1,473Only GPT-5.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured86.6%Only GPT-5.1 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured83.2%Only GPT-5.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured87.3%Only GPT-5.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.5%Only GPT-5.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)37.7%87.6%GPT-5.1
ARC-AGINot measured72.8%Only GPT-5.1 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured17.6%Only GPT-5.1 measured
SimpleBench10.7%53.2%GPT-5.1
Chess puzzles3.0%42.0%GPT-5.1
Mystery game puzzles12.0%19.0%GPT-5.1
VPCT34.0%58.7%GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts12671457GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: expert12341470GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12781462GPT-5.1
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1264Only GPT-5.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1272Only GPT-5.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1Leader
AIMENot measured93.3%Only GPT-5.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured93.0%Only GPT-5.1 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured94.0Only GPT-5.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured94.0%Only GPT-5.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.9%88.6%GPT-5.1
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MATH level 552.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: math12671446GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work12711449GPT-5.1
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured86.4%Only GPT-5.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.7%Only GPT-5.1 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured73.4%Only GPT-5.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured63.8%Only GPT-5.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.9%Only GPT-5.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured61.4%Only GPT-5.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.4%Only GPT-5.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured52.7%Only GPT-5.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured87.0%Only GPT-5.1 measured
SimpleQA Verified8.3%48.0%GPT-5.1
MMLU76.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBench64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: science12861459GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12821456GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: legal and government13051459GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: business and finance12651431GPT-5.1
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1187Only GPT-5.1 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1166Only GPT-5.1 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1179Only GPT-5.1 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1204Only GPT-5.1 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1061Only GPT-5.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1171Only GPT-5.1 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1149Only GPT-5.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1118Only GPT-5.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured43.2%Only GPT-5.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.1%Only GPT-5.1 measured
IFBenchNot measured72.9%Only GPT-5.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured80.0%Only GPT-5.1 measured
DTBenchNot measured90.1%Only GPT-5.1 measured
LMCANot measured43.9%Only GPT-5.1 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)67.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
CL-benchNot measured23.7%Only GPT-5.1 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured17.3%Only GPT-5.1 measured
LMArena Text12861443GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: instruction following12581443GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: creative writing12681427GPT-5.1
LMArena Vision10661250GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: English13011451GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: non-English12661431GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: Chinese12651495GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: German12721438GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: Japanese12161453GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: Korean11951401GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: French12971450GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: Spanish12761433GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: Russian12751435GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: Polish12441440GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn12851450GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: longer queries12891448GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: writing and language12821428GPT-5.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12531415GPT-5.1
LMArena Vision: English10721252GPT-5.1
LMArena Vision: Chinese10331270GPT-5.1
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1255Only GPT-5.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1263Only GPT-5.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1252Only GPT-5.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1232Only GPT-5.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1266Only GPT-5.1 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1403Only GPT-5.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request
GPT-5.1$0.0063Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request
GPT-5.1$0.092Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window
GPT-5.1$0.350Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI GPT-5.1
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024November 13, 2025
Context window128K400K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.60$10.00
Coding index3.653.3
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.02
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) better than GPT-5.1 for coding?

Pick GPT-5.1 for coding: it scores 53.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 3.6 for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18). Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 16.7x less.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or GPT-5.1?

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1 costs $1.25 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or GPT-5.1?

GPT-5.1, with 400K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs GPT-5.1 comparison based on?

39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-5.1's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next