Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs 5.6x less per output token than GPT-4o (2024-11-20) ($1.80 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
1
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen
Coding
39.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
9
vs boards won of 11 shared, 1 tied

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: which to pick

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-11-20) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for work measured by MMMU Pro (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
11
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) only
13
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only
14
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 77.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 6.3% against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 86.7%, 80.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $10.00 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 per million output tokens, 5.6x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-11-20)BarsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Ties
Coding01
Reasoning12
Math02
Knowledge041 tie
All shared boards191 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Aider polyglot18.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)43.4%85.3%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
GSO-Bench0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
WeirdML25.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Cybench12.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
ALE-BenchNot measured608.9Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Intelligence Index8.4Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.2Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
TheAgentCompany8.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$1Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
GPQA Diamond53.8%87.4%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)62.2%22.8%GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.9%84.8%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Chess puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
VPCT40.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AIME11.9%86.0%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MATH 500 (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%86.7%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MATH level 549.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
MMLU Pro72.6%87.2%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.2%85.1%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
CaseLaw (Vals AI)59.7%59.7%Tie
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.9%65.3%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.4%60.8%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured95.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured25.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
GeoBench71.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
DTBenchNot measured80.5%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMCANot measured36.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CL-benchNot measured19.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured12.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.0075Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.155Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.600Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.078Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 20, 2024April 27, 2026
Context window128K1M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.30
Output $/Mtok$10.00$1.80
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.5
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-11-20) better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding?

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-11-20) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for work measured by MMMU Pro (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 and $1.80. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next