LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Llama 4 Maverick

Updated October 21, 2026. 50 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Replace GPT-4o (2024-08-06) Replace Llama 4 Maverick
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)OpenAI
Coding
23.1
Overall
7.7
Output $/M
$10.00
14
Llama 4 MaverickMeta Llama
Coding
18.1
Overall
9.3
Output $/M
$0.6525
36
vs boards won of 50 shared

Decision reading

Pick GPT-4o (2024-08-06) for coding: it scores 23.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 18.1 for Llama 4 Maverick, though on 1 benchmark against 2.

Pick Llama 4 Maverick when output tokens cost 15.3x less, or when the context window is larger, 524K against 128K tokens.

Model AGPT-4o (2024-08-06)OpenAI23.1/1001 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BLlama 4 MaverickMeta Llama18.1/1002 independent benchmarks$1.491 per solved task
Shared results
50
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) only
8
Llama 4 Maverick only
34
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 23.1 from 1 benchmark, Llama 4 Maverick 18.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 11.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
MedQA (Vals AI): GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 88.2% against Llama 4 Maverick 43.3%, 44.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) $10.00 against Llama 4 Maverick $0.6525 per million output tokens, 15.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) takes 128K tokens, Llama 4 Maverick 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-08-06)BarsLlama 4 MaverickTies
Coding23
Intelligence01
Agentic work10
Reasoning07
Math05
Knowledge46
General714
All shared boards1436
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index23
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Aider polyglot23.1%15.6%GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured21.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SWE-bench Lite21.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured16.3Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured47.3%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)31.7%39.7%Llama 4 Maverick
SciCodeNot measured31.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%6.8%GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
WeirdMLNot measured24.5%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
ALE-BenchNot measured173.0Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: coding12831301Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: software and IT12781299Llama 4 Maverick
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.79.3Llama 4 Maverick
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured132.2Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.6Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
τ²-Bench Telecom28.9%17.8%GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Llama 4 MaverickLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured69.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)64.0%71.7%Llama 4 Maverick
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)52.1%67.1%Llama 4 Maverick
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.3%4.9%Llama 4 Maverick
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)49.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
ARC-AGINot measured4.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured0.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SimpleBench17.8%27.7%Llama 4 Maverick
Chess puzzles6.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12641281Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: expert12411259Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12771295Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1134Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1164Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AIME14.0%25.2%Llama 4 Maverick
MATH 500 (Vals AI)75.2%85.2%Llama 4 Maverick
MGSM (Vals AI)90.7%92.4%Llama 4 Maverick
AA Math IndexNot measured19.3Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured19.3%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MATH level 553.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: math12851299Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: mathematical work12831295Llama 4 Maverick
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index46
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Llama 4 MaverickLeader
MMLU Pro74.1%79.4%Llama 4 Maverick
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.1%77.8%GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
CorpFin (Vals AI)39.4%49.7%Llama 4 Maverick
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%66.6%GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.0%58.5%GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
MedQA (Vals AI)88.2%43.3%GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured36.5%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SimpleQA Verified26.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MMLU84.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
GeoBenchNot measured52.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: science12741288Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12521275Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: legal and government12751286Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: business and finance12321260Llama 4 Maverick
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured871Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured899Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured838Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured882Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured901Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured880Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index714
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Llama 4 MaverickLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured35.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured54.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
IFBench36.0%43.0%Llama 4 Maverick
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)41.0%50.0%Llama 4 Maverick
DTBenchNot measured61.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMCANot measured15.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured46.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured62.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text12831287Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: instruction following12671267Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: creative writing12741266GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
LMArena Vision10651142Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: English12971303Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: non-English12621269Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: Chinese12541277Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: German12571291Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: Japanese12341206GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
LMArena Text: Korean12181203GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
LMArena Text: French12631259GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
LMArena Text: Spanish12691293Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: Russian12721286Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1275Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12791289Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text: longer queries12831280GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
LMArena Text: writing and language12901277GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12671250GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
LMArena Vision: English10721150Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Vision: Chinese10091141Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1143Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1100Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1099Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.0075Fits in one request
Llama 4 Maverick$0.0005Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.155Fits in one request
Llama 4 Maverick$0.011Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.600Exceeds the context window
Llama 4 Maverick$0.044Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Llama 4 Maverick
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Meta Llama 4 Maverick
MakerOpenAIMeta Llama
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 6, 2024April 5, 2025
Context window128K524K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.1875
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.6525
Coding index23.118.1
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.491
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-08-06) better than Llama 4 Maverick for coding?

Pick GPT-4o (2024-08-06) for coding: it scores 23.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 18.1 for Llama 4 Maverick, though on 1 benchmark against 2. Pick Llama 4 Maverick when output tokens cost 15.3x less, or when the context window is larger, 524K against 128K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Llama 4 Maverick?

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.1875 and $0.6525. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Maverick only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick, with 524K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Llama 4 Maverick comparison based on?

50 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-08-06)'s coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Llama 4 Maverick's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next