Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4 vs Muse Spark Open

Updated October 21, 2026. 2 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4OpenAI
Coding
22.4
Overall
6.7
Output $/M
$60.00
0
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
62.1
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.25
2
vs boards won of 2 shared

Decision reading

GPT-4 scores 22.4 and Muse Spark Open 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.

Pick Muse Spark Open when output tokens cost 14.1x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 8K tokens.

Shared results
2
GPT-4 only
43
Muse Spark Open only
24
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4 22.4 from 1 benchmark, Muse Spark Open 62.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 54.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-4 34.9% against Muse Spark Open 89.0%, 54.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4 $60.00 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 14.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-4 takes 8K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4BarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
All shared boards02
CodingDirectional onlyFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index15 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4Muse Spark OpenLeader
SWE-bench Verified22.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
SWE-bench Lite39.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
SWE-bench (full test set)12.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1528Only Muse Spark Open measured
AA Coding Index13.1Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
SciCodeNot measured58.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1590.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena Text: coding1209Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1195Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1529Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1495Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4Muse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index125.7155.1Muse Spark Open
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)34.9%89.0%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured43.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1200Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: expert1149Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1209Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4Muse Spark OpenLeader
GSM8K92.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: math1230Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1228Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4Muse Spark OpenLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)56.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
MMLU86.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
AI2 Reasoning Challenge96.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: science1177Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1145Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1191Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1145Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4Muse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1311Only Muse Spark Open measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1290Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
IFBench33.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured78.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
DTBench62.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMCA17.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
HellaSwag95.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
WinoGrande87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text1206Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1201Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1191Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: English1220Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1194Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1184Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: German1198Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1137Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1087Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: French1220Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1197Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1195Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1265Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1206Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1190Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1219Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1184Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4Muse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4$0.060Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4$1.68Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4$6.60Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4 and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4Meta Muse Spark Open
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2023October 15, 2026
Context window8K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$30.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$60.00$4.25
Coding index22.462.1
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4 better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

GPT-4 scores 22.4 and Muse Spark Open 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick Muse Spark Open when output tokens cost 14.1x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 8K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 or Muse Spark Open?

GPT-4 costs $30.00 per million input tokens and $60.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4 or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4 vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Muse Spark Open's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next