GPT-4.1 Nano vs o3 Pro
Updated October 21, 2026. 10 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick o3 Pro for coding: it scores 84.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 8.9 for GPT-4.1 Nano.
Pick GPT-4.1 Nano when output tokens cost 200.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 200K tokens.
- Shared results
- 10
- GPT-4.1 Nano only
- 59
- o3 Pro only
- 1
- Like-for-like categories
- 4 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
o3 Pro
o3 Pro scores 84.9 against 8.9.
One benchmark behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
o3 Pro
o3 Pro leads, 21.9 against 7.8.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-4.1 Nano has a GPQA Diamond result, 50.8%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only GPT-4.1 Nano has a AIME result, 26.5%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-4.1 Nano has a MMLU Pro result, 63.5%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only GPT-4.1 Nano has a Design Arena: websites result, 973.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-4.1 Nano
GPT-4.1 Nano takes 1.05M tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-4.1 Nano
GPT-4.1 Nano $0.0003, o3 Pro $0.060 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-4.1 Nano 8.9 from 1 benchmark, o3 Pro 84.9 from 1 benchmark.
- Widest category
- Coding, 57.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Aider polyglot: GPT-4.1 Nano 8.9% against o3 Pro 84.9%, 76.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-4.1 Nano $0.40 against o3 Pro $80.00 per million output tokens, 200.0x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-4.1 Nano takes 1.05M tokens, o3 Pro 200K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-4.1 Nano | Bars | o3 Pro | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 3 | ||
| General | 0 | 3 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 10 |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | o3 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | 8.9% | 84.9% | o3 Pro |
| AA Coding Index | 11.1 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 42.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 32.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| WeirdML | 19.0% | 58.2% | o3 Pro |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1306 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1305 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | o3 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 7.8 | 21.9 | o3 Pro |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.5 | 147.3 | o3 Pro |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | o3 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 17.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | o3 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 50.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 55.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 51.2% | 84.5% | o3 Pro |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 48.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| ARC-AGI | 0.0% | 59.3% | o3 Pro |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.0% | 4.9% | o3 Pro |
| Chess puzzles | 0.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1286 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1271 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1293 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | o3 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 26.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 80.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 69.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| AA Math Index | 24.0 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 24.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 28.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| MATH level 5 | 70.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1274 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1274 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | o3 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 63.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 61.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 42.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 60.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 52.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 68.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 65.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 6.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1297 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1276 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1300 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1267 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | o3 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 973 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 916 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 971 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 891 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 925 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 963 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | o3 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 32.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 20.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 86.9% | o3 Pro |
| LMCA | 5.5% | 38.5% | o3 Pro |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 25.0% | 97.2% | o3 Pro |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | Not measured | 84.4% | Only o3 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text | 1285 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1266 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1260 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision | 1063 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1303 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1260 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1270 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1288 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1198 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1261 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1277 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1283 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1261 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1243 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1101 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | o3 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-4.1 Nano costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-4.1 Nano costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-4.1 Nano costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-4.1 Nano | OpenAI o3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | April 14, 2025 | June 10, 2025 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 200K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.10 | $20.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.40 | $80.00 |
| Coding index | 8.9 | 84.9 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-4.1 Nano better than o3 Pro for coding?
Pick o3 Pro for coding: it scores 84.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 8.9 for GPT-4.1 Nano. Pick GPT-4.1 Nano when output tokens cost 200.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 200K tokens.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Nano or o3 Pro?
GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; o3 Pro costs $20.00 and $80.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4.1 Nano or o3 Pro?
GPT-4.1 Nano, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-4.1 Nano vs o3 Pro comparison based on?
10 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4.1 Nano's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and o3 Pro's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.