Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs GLM 4.7

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs 1.5x less per output token than GLM 4.7 ($1.50 vs $2.20 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
GLM 4.7Z.ai
Coding
55.1
Overall
56.9
Output $/M
$2.20
vs $1.50 vs $2.20 per 1M output tokens. Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is 1.5x cheaper.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or GLM 4.7: which to pick

Only GLM 4.7 has a coding score, 55.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($1.50 vs $2.20 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; GLM 4.7 on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) not benchmarked, GLM 4.7 55.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) $1.50 against GLM 4.7 $2.20 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) takes 66K tokens, GLM 4.7 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1435Only GLM 4.7 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured45.3Only GLM 4.7 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only GLM 4.7 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured69.4%Only GLM 4.7 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.4%Only GLM 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured31.8%Only GLM 4.7 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured33.4%Only GLM 4.7 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured399.5Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1454Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1453Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1420Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1447Only GLM 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured22.2Only GLM 4.7 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured143.6Only GLM 4.7 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7Leader
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1050Only GLM 4.7 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1105Only GLM 4.7 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1112Only GLM 4.7 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1058Only GLM 4.7 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.9%Only GLM 4.7 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$2,377Only GLM 4.7 measured
BrowseComp-PlusNot measured64.7%Only GLM 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured80.0%Only GLM 4.7 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.9%Only GLM 4.7 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured27.4%Only GLM 4.7 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured83.3%Only GLM 4.7 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured47.7%Only GLM 4.7 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured21.0%Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1443Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1424Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1452Only GLM 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7Leader
AIMENot measured93.3%Only GLM 4.7 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured88.2%Only GLM 4.7 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured95.0Only GLM 4.7 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured95.0%Only GLM 4.7 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured83.3%Only GLM 4.7 measured
ProofBenchNot measured6.0%Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1424Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1411Only GLM 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7Leader
MMLU ProNot measured82.7%Only GLM 4.7 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.4%Only GLM 4.7 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured54.9%Only GLM 4.7 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured46.4%Only GLM 4.7 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured68.8%Only GLM 4.7 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured93.7%Only GLM 4.7 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured32.8%Only GLM 4.7 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.6%Only GLM 4.7 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured32.2%Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1457Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1469Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1444Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1429Only GLM 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1226Only GLM 4.7 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1199Only GLM 4.7 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1189Only GLM 4.7 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1195Only GLM 4.7 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1191Only GLM 4.7 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1217Only GLM 4.7 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1143Only GLM 4.7 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1165Only GLM 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards measured
General benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7Leader
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured68.6%Only GLM 4.7 measured
IFBenchNot measured67.9%Only GLM 4.7 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured71.0%Only GLM 4.7 measured
CL-benchNot measured15.9%Only GLM 4.7 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured10.9%Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1435Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1412Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1401Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1453Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1417Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1495Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1426Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1439Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1399Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1432Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1434Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1423Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1435Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1446Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1432Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1411Only GLM 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1400Only GLM 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Image generation benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7Leader
Design Arena: images1239Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
Design Arena: graphic design1249Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
Design Arena: logos1214Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
LMArena Text to Image1250Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
LMArena Image Edit1313Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)$0.0010Fits in one request
GLM 4.7$0.0017Fits in one request

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)$0.017Fits in one request
GLM 4.7$0.037Fits in one request

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)$0.065Exceeds the context window
GLM 4.7$0.142Exceeds the context window

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7
SpecificationGoogle Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Z.ai GLM 4.7
MakerGoogleZ.ai
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 30, 2026December 22, 2025
Context window66K205K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.60
Output $/Mtok$1.50$2.20
Coding indexNot benchmarked55.1
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.29
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) better than GLM 4.7 for coding?

Only GLM 4.7 has a coding score, 55.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($1.50 vs $2.20 per million).

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or GLM 4.7?

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GLM 4.7 costs $0.60 and $2.20. Cost per solved task is known for GLM 4.7 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or GLM 4.7?

GLM 4.7, with 205K tokens against 66K.

Has any benchmark tested both Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; GLM 4.7 on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next