Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs 1.4x less per output token than Gemini 2.5 Flash ($1.80 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
34.3
Output $/M
$2.50
2
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen
Coding
39.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
3
vs boards won of 5 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: which to pick

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for a lower cost per solved task ($0.466 against $1.35) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
5
Gemini 2.5 Flash only
68
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only
20
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
General, 9.1 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
SAGE (Vals AI): Gemini 2.5 Flash 44.8% against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 30.4%, 14.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash $2.50 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 FlashBarsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Ties
Intelligence01
Agentic work10
General12
All shared boards23
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
SWE-bench Verified28.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)69.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench17.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured608.9Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: coding1423Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1425Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Intelligence Index15.5Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Epoch Capabilities Index142.9146.2Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom31.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
BALROG33.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$549$1Gemini 2.5 Flash
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
BrowseComp-Plus39.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured22.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured84.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
ARC-AGI33.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-22.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
SimpleBench41.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1422Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1426Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1420Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1245Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1244Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark56.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AIMENot measured86.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
AA Math Index73.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: math1411Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1422Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.1%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.3%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured60.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured95.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)40.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured25.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: science1433Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1428Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1430Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1404Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite47.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Design Arena: websites1074Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1002Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1004Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1060Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1020Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1059Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1020Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)44.8%30.4%Gemini 2.5 Flash
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
IFBench50.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
DTBench76.5%80.5%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
LMCA27.5%36.4%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
CL-benchNot measured19.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured12.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text1417Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1405Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1400Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision1235Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1418Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1409Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1449Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1417Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1396Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1385Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1432Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1422Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1415Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1413Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1408Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1419Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1405Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1393Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: English1239Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1284Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1237Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1225Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1277Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1252Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1241Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.0015Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.022Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.085Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.078Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 FlashQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 17, 2025April 27, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.30
Output $/Mtok$2.50$1.80
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.5
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved task$0.466$1.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding?

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for a lower cost per solved task ($0.466 against $1.35) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 and $1.80. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.466 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.35.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Gemini 2.5 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next