Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout

Gemini 2.5 Flash leads Llama 4 Scout on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 15.5 to 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout costs 5.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 63 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemini 2.5 Flash Replace Llama 4 Scout
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
34.3
Output $/M
$2.50
63
Llama 4 ScoutMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
24.9
Output $/M
$0.50
0
vs boards won of 63 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash or Llama 4 Scout: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for a lower cost per solved task ($0.466 against $1.276).

Model AGemini 2.5 FlashGoogleNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmark$0.466 per solved taskModel BLlama 4 ScoutMeta LlamaNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmark$1.276 per solved task
Shared results
63
Gemini 2.5 Flash only
10
Llama 4 Scout only
19
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash not benchmarked, Llama 4 Scout not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 40.5 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run): Gemini 2.5 Flash 73.3% against Llama 4 Scout 14.0%, 59.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash $2.50 against Llama 4 Scout $0.50 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Llama 4 Scout 1.31M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 FlashBarsLlama 4 ScoutTies
Coding50
Intelligence20
Agentic work20
Reasoning100
Math40
Knowledge60
Web design50
General290
All shared boards630
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashLlama 4 ScoutLeader
SWE-bench Verified28.7%9.1%Gemini 2.5 Flash
AA Coding IndexNot measured8.2Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)69.5%29.9%Gemini 2.5 Flash
SciCodeNot measured21.3%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%1.5%Gemini 2.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench17.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding14231286Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14251286Gemini 2.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashLlama 4 ScoutLeader
AA Intelligence Index15.56.5Gemini 2.5 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index142.9129.6Gemini 2.5 Flash
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashLlama 4 ScoutLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.5Only Llama 4 Scout measured
τ²-Bench Telecom31.6%15.5%Gemini 2.5 Flash
BALROG33.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$549Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.2%28.1%Gemini 2.5 Flash
BrowseComp-Plus39.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index100
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashLlama 4 ScoutLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured47.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured58.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.0%58.7%Gemini 2.5 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.1%3.8%Gemini 2.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured51.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
ARC-AGI33.3%0.5%Gemini 2.5 Flash
ARC-AGI-22.5%0.0%Gemini 2.5 Flash
SimpleBench41.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14221266Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: expert14261235Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14201293Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams12451125Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: homework12441148Gemini 2.5 Flash
Kagi LLM Benchmark56.8%36.9%Gemini 2.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashLlama 4 ScoutLeader
AIMENot measured19.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured79.2%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
AA Math Index73.314.0Gemini 2.5 Flash
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%14.0%Gemini 2.5 Flash
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured7.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH level 5Not measured62.3%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: math14111287Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14221286Gemini 2.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashLlama 4 ScoutLeader
MMLU ProNot measured69.6%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured46.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured55.2%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured57.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured50.9%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MedCode (Vals AI)40.4%23.3%Gemini 2.5 Flash
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.2%75.2%Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: science14331278Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14281275Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14301285Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14041257Gemini 2.5 Flash
FACTS Benchmark Suite47.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashLlama 4 ScoutLeader
Design Arena: websites1074750Gemini 2.5 Flash
Design Arena: UI components1002765Gemini 2.5 Flash
Design Arena: game dev1004772Gemini 2.5 Flash
Design Arena: data viz1060896Gemini 2.5 Flash
Design Arena: 3D1020Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1059789Gemini 2.5 Flash
Design Arena: SVG1020Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index290
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashLlama 4 ScoutLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)44.8%34.8%Gemini 2.5 Flash
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.0%50.6%Gemini 2.5 Flash
IFBench50.3%39.5%Gemini 2.5 Flash
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.3%27.7%Gemini 2.5 Flash
DTBench76.5%57.9%Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMCA27.5%12.0%Gemini 2.5 Flash
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured36.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text14171279Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14051248Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14001249Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision12351118Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: English14181304Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14091252Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese14491255Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: German14171273Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese13961206Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean13851207Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: French14321283Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14221278Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian14151263Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish14131265Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14081280Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14191265Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14051269Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13931242Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: English12391143Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: Chinese12841106Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: reading text12371117Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: humor12251102Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: captioning1277Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1252Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12411126Gemini 2.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashLlama 4 ScoutLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.0015Fits in one request
Llama 4 Scout$0.0004Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.022Fits in one request
Llama 4 Scout$0.010Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.085Fits in one request
Llama 4 Scout$0.040Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash and Llama 4 Scout
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 FlashMeta Llama 4 Scout
MakerGoogleMeta Llama
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 17, 2025April 5, 2025
Context window1.05M1.31M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.175
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved task$0.466$1.276
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Llama 4 Scout for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for a lower cost per solved task ($0.466 against $1.276).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Llama 4 Scout?

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Llama 4 Scout costs $0.175 and $0.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.466 and Llama 4 Scout $1.276.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout, with 1.31M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout comparison based on?

63 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Llama 4 Scout's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next