Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite leads Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 10.4 to 9.9, and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs 4.7x less per output token ($0.40 vs $1.90 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.40
1
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
10
vs boards won of 11 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 4.7x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.90 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
11
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite only
19
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
38
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 35.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite 19.0% against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 54.1%, 35.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.40 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 4.7x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 Flash LiteBarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Coding02
Intelligence10
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Math02
Knowledge01
General02
All shared boards110
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)71.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)59.3%64.6%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%11.4%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1438Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1442Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index10.49.9Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Epoch Capabilities Index133.8Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom19.0%54.1%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)36.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond70.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)75.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)62.5%77.2%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%11.9%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1428Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1442Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1439Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1255Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1277Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AIME42.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MGSM (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AA Math Index53.388.3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)53.3%88.3%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1425Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1419Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro79.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedQA (Vals AI)88.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)34.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.9%83.6%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1444Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1431Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1438Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1433Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)30.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)75.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
IFBench49.9%56.5%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%63.7%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
DTBench62.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMCA18.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena TextNot measured1420Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1406Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1366Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1247Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1429Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1405Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1463Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1424Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1385Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1394Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1452Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1428Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1408Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1419Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1428Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1419Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1392Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1368Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1256Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1283Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1253Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1209Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1281Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1249Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0062Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.024Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 22, 2025September 23, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.21
Output $/Mtok$0.40$1.90
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 4.7x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.90 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next