Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B leads Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.9 to 10.4, and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs 3.8x less per output token ($0.40 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.40
7
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
5
vs boards won of 12 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
12
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite only
18
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B only
41
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 24.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite 19.0% against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 43.6%, 24.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.40 against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B $1.50 per million output tokens, 3.8x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 Flash LiteBarsQwen3 Coder 480B A35BTies
Coding11
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning21
Math20
Knowledge01
General20
All shared boards75
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured69.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1275Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)71.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)59.3%58.5%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%18.9%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Terminal-BenchNot measured27.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
GSO-BenchNot measured4.9%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
WeirdMLNot measured41.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
ALE-BenchNot measured461.4Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1412Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1393Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1257Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1287Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Intelligence Index10.411.9Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Epoch Capabilities Index133.8Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom19.0%43.6%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)36.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
GPQA Diamond70.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)75.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)62.5%61.8%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%4.5%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1372Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1338Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1380Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%49.5%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AIME42.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MGSM (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AA Math Index53.339.3Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)53.3%39.3%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1365Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1367Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
MMLU Pro79.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedQA (Vals AI)88.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)34.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.9%78.8%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1347Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1347Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1358Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1343Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1159Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1113Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1099Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1084Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1143Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)30.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)75.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
IFBench49.9%40.5%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%45.7%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
DTBench62.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMCA18.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena TextNot measured1357Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1355Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1333Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1359Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1346Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1357Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1325Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1311Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1305Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1398Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1360Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1366Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1344Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1366Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1378Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1340Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1317Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.0010Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0062Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.019Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.024Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.075Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder 480B A35B
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 22, 2025July 23, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.40$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs $0.30 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next