Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs 1.4x less per output token than Mistral Small 3.1 24B ($0.40 vs $0.555 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.40
Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.555
vs $0.40 vs $0.555 per 1M output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is 1.4x cheaper.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Small 3.1 24B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 1.4x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.555 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 128K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has results on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); Mistral Small 3.1 24B on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3.1 24B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.40 against Mistral Small 3.1 24B $0.555 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 24B 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)71.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)59.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1309Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1301Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
AA Intelligence Index10.4Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Epoch Capabilities Index133.8Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom19.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)36.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
GPQA Diamond70.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)75.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)62.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1278Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1257Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1290Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1119Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1158Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
AIME42.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MGSM (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AA Math Index53.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)53.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1261Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1271Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
MMLU Pro79.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedQA (Vals AI)88.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)34.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1265Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1267Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1271Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1257Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31 boards measured
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)30.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)75.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
IFBench49.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
DTBench62.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMCA18.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena TextNot measured1277Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1263Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1252Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1136Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1295Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1255Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1253Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1266Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1208Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1207Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1273Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1284Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1263Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1242Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1270Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1299Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1268Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1250Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1157Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1155Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1132Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1142Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1153Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1155Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1123Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0003Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.0006Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0062Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.019Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.024Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.076Exceeds the context window

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Small 3.1 24B
MakerGoogleMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 22, 2025March 17, 2025
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.351
Output $/Mtok$0.40$0.555
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite better than Mistral Small 3.1 24B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 1.4x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.555 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.351 and $0.555. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has results on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); Mistral Small 3.1 24B on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next