Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite leads Mistral Medium 3.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 10.4 to 9.2, and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs 5.0x less per output token ($0.40 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 23 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Medium 3.1: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($0.40 vs $2.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 131K tokens).
- Shared results
- 23
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite only
- 7
- Mistral Medium 3.1 only
- 51
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite leads, 10.4 against 9.2.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.1 has a AA Agentic Index result, 1.9.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has a GPQA Diamond result, 70.2%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral Medium 3.1 leads, 42.3% against 42.1%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite leads, 79.1% against 75.3%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.1 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1132.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.0003, Mistral Medium 3.1 $0.0014 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 21.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- LiveCodeBench (Vals AI): Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite 71.4% against Mistral Medium 3.1 44.8%, 26.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.40 against Mistral Medium 3.1 $2.00 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Medium 3.1 131K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Bars | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 1 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 3 | 0 | ||
| Math | 2 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 6 | 1 | ||
| General | 2 | 2 | ||
| All shared boards | 16 | 7 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index21
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 20.5 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 71.4% | 44.8% | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 59.3% | 40.6% | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| SciCode | Not measured | 32.4% | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.5% | 10.6% | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 210.2 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1433 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1436 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 10.4 | 9.2 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.8 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 1.9 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 19.0% | 40.6% | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 36.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 70.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 75.4% | 63.0% | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 62.5% | 58.8% | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 6.8% | 4.7% | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1426 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1408 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1435 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1175 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1165 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 42.1% | 42.3% | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 87.0% | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 89.5% | 90.9% | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
| AA Math Index | 53.3 | 38.3 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 53.3% | 38.3% | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1408 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1412 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 79.1% | 75.3% | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 82.0% | 62.0% | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 57.6% | 50.7% | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 66.2% | 70.3% | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 57.6% | 36.5% | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 88.9% | 78.2% | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 34.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 75.9% | 68.3% | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1444 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1449 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1439 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1418 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1132 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1097 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1073 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1144 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1081 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1120 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 992 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 997 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 30.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 75.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| IFBench | 49.9% | 39.8% | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 55.7% | 42.7% | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| DTBench | 62.8% | 67.5% | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
| LMCA | 18.1% | 19.1% | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1424 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1398 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1391 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1172 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1438 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1408 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1447 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1432 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1379 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1380 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1460 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1433 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1411 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1430 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1418 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1406 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1395 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1390 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1179 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1190 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1175 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1168 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | Not measured | 1145 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1147 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1200 | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Mistral AI | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 22, 2025 | August 13, 2025 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.10 | $0.40 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.40 | $2.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite better than Mistral Medium 3.1 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($0.40 vs $2.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 131K tokens).
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Mistral Medium 3.1 comparison based on?
23 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3.1's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.