Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Mistral Medium 3

Updated October 21, 2026. 13 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
10.4
Output $/M
$0.40
10
Mistral Medium 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
9.0
Output $/M
$2.00
3
vs boards won of 13 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has the edge where output tokens cost 5.0x less, and where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 131K tokens.

Shared results
13
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite only
15
Mistral Medium 3 only
44
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 23.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite 55.7% against Mistral Medium 3 31.3%, 24.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.40 against Mistral Medium 3 $2.00 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Medium 3 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 Flash LiteBarsMistral Medium 3Ties
Coding20
Intelligence11
Agentic work01
Reasoning20
Math20
Knowledge01
General30
All shared boards103
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)71.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)59.3%40.0%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%3.8%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1385Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1385Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
AA Intelligence Index10.49.0Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Epoch Capabilities Index133.8134.0Mistral Medium 3
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom19.0%24.3%Mistral Medium 3
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
GPQA Diamond70.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)75.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)62.5%57.8%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%4.1%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1364Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1342Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1374Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1155Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1165Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
AIME42.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MGSM (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AA Math Index53.330.3Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)53.3%30.3%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1353Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1354Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
MMLU Pro79.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedQA (Vals AI)88.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)34.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.9%76.0%Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1381Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1381Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1384Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1352Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1079Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1024Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1018Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1034Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1083Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1069Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)30.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)75.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
IFBench49.9%39.3%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%31.3%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
DTBench62.8%62.3%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
LMCA18.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena TextNot measured1370Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1338Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1343Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1157Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1385Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1353Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1374Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1377Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1316Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1304Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1368Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1364Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1359Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1371Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1384Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1360Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1352Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1335Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1172Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1161Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1154Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1145Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1094Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1141Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1146Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0003Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.0014Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0062Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.026Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.024Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.100Exceeds the context window

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Medium 3
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Medium 3
MakerGoogleMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 22, 2025May 7, 2025
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.40
Output $/Mtok$0.40$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite better than Mistral Medium 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has the edge where output tokens cost 5.0x less, and where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 131K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Medium 3?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Medium 3?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Mistral Medium 3 comparison based on?

13 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next