Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Mistral Large 3 2512

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite leads Mistral Large 3 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 10.4 to 9.3, and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs 3.8x less per output token ($0.40 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 15 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.40
10
Mistral Large 3 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
5
vs boards won of 15 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Large 3 2512: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
15
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite only
15
Mistral Large 3 2512 only
13
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite not benchmarked, Mistral Large 3 2512 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 16.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI): Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite 71.4% against Mistral Large 3 2512 55.3%, 16.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.40 against Mistral Large 3 2512 $1.50 per million output tokens, 3.8x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Large 3 2512 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 Flash LiteBarsMistral Large 3 2512Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
Math11
Knowledge33
General21
All shared boards105
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured20.1Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)71.4%55.3%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured41.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)59.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
ALE-BenchNot measured264.7Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Intelligence Index10.49.3Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Epoch Capabilities Index133.8Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.0Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom19.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)36.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Large 3 2512Leader
GPQA Diamond70.2%68.4%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)75.4%66.2%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)62.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AIME42.1%42.9%Mistral Large 3 2512
MGSM (Vals AI)89.5%85.4%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
AA Math Index53.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)53.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Large 3 2512Leader
MMLU Pro79.1%79.8%Mistral Large 3 2512
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.0%79.1%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured61.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)57.6%61.0%Mistral Large 3 2512
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.2%73.1%Mistral Large 3 2512
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.6%52.1%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
MedQA (Vals AI)88.9%82.2%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
MedCode (Vals AI)34.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Large 3 2512Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1162Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1102Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1080Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1136Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1100Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1142Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured993Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1069Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Large 3 2512Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)30.8%24.6%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
MedScribe (Vals AI)75.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
IFBench49.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
DTBench62.8%65.1%Mistral Large 3 2512
LMCA18.1%16.7%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Large 3 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0003Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.0013Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0062Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.029Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.024Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.115Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Large 3 2512
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteMistral Large 3 2512
MakerGoogleMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 22, 2025December 1, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.50
Output $/Mtok$0.40$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.77
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite better than Mistral Large 3 2512 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Large 3 2512?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 3 2512 costs $0.50 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Large 3 2512 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Large 3 2512?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Mistral Large 3 2512 comparison based on?

15 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 3 2512's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next