Ember-1 vs Gemma 4 31B
Ember-1 leads Gemma 4 31B on coding, 52.6 to 39.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemma 4 31B costs 37.5x less per output token ($0.40 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- 52.6
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $15.00
- Coding
- 39.0
- Overall
- 42.1
- Output $/M
- $0.40
Ember-1 or Gemma 4 31B: which to pick
Ember-1 scores 52.6 and Gemma 4 31B 39.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.
Pick Ember-1 for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens). Pick Gemma 4 31B for output tokens 37.5x cheaper ($0.40 vs $15.00 per million).
No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Gemma 4 31B on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and AA Coding Index. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
52.6 against 39.0, from different benchmarks with none in common.
Directional only
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Gemma 4 31B has a AA Intelligence Index result, 14.7.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Gemma 4 31B has a AA Agentic Index result, 4.2.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Ember-1
Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 4 31B
Ember-1 $0.011, Gemma 4 31B $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Ember-1 52.6 from 2 benchmarks, Gemma 4 31B 39.0 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Ember-1 $15.00 against Gemma 4 31B $0.40 per million output tokens, 37.5x apart.
- Context window
- Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens, Gemma 4 31B 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index17 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 49.0% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1367 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 43.4 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 20.7% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 83.9% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 32.5% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 46.3% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 69.5% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 45.5% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 36.4% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 52.3% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 925.5 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1459 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1463 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1359 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1380 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 8.9% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 14.7 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 143.0 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 4.2 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 44.4% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 4.0% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 13.3% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 51.8% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 31.1% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 44.7% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 63.4% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 67.0% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 5.7% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Vals Science Index | 31.8% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 65.5% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 68.3% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 22.5% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 85.7% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 23.6% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 75.8% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1448 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1464 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1456 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1283 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1310 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 63.5% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 73.3% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1463 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1465 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 52.6% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.4% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 10.4% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1457 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1451 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1438 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1430 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | Not measured | 45.3% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 58.4% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 53.3% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 66.2% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 55.0% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 75.6% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 69.7% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| DTBench | Not measured | 82.7% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 39.3% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 30.6% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1443 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1433 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1417 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1276 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1451 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1430 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1475 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1436 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1442 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1460 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1433 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1452 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1446 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1432 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1405 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1271 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1326 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1282 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1280 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | Not measured | 1218 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1226 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1285 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1425 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 4 31B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemma 4 31B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemma 4 31B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Fireworks Ember-1 | Google Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Fireworks | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | September 24, 2026 | April 2, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $3.00 | $0.14 |
| Output $/Mtok | $15.00 | $0.40 |
| Coding index | 52.6 | 39.0 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Ember-1 better than Gemma 4 31B for coding?
Ember-1 scores 52.6 and Gemma 4 31B 39.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick Ember-1 for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens). Pick Gemma 4 31B for output tokens 37.5x cheaper ($0.40 vs $15.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Gemma 4 31B?
Ember-1 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Ember-1 or Gemma 4 31B?
Ember-1, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Has any benchmark tested both Ember-1 and Gemma 4 31B?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Gemma 4 31B on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and AA Coding Index. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.