Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Muse Spark Open

Updated October 21, 2026. 8 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
55.0
Overall
16.6
Output $/M
$0.41
0
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
62.1
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.25
8
vs boards won of 8 shared

Decision reading

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 55.0 for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp when output tokens cost 10.4x less.

Shared results
8
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
49
Muse Spark Open only
18
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 55.0 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark Open 62.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 36.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 1272 against Muse Spark Open 1528, 36.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 10.4x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 ExpBarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
Web design02
General01
All shared boards08
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark OpenLeader
Aider polyglot74.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev12721528Muse Spark Open
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
SciCodeNot measured58.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1590.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena Text: coding1438Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1438Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1529Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML12811495Muse Spark Open
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.6Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9155.1Muse Spark Open
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
TheAgentCompany42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%89.0%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%43.9%Muse Spark Open
LMArena Text: hard prompts1429Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: expert1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1444Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: math1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1433Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark OpenLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: science1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1468Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1412Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websites11791311Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: UI components1166Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: game dev11451290Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: data viz1152Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: 3D1148Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: all code categories1171Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: SVG1031Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
IFBench54.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%78.3%Muse Spark Open
DTBench87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMCA29.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1401Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1404Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: English1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: non-English1404Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1461Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: German1440Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1331Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Korean1372Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: French1434Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Russian1412Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Polish1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1418Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1407Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1407Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMeta Muse Spark Open
MakerDeepSeekMeta
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025October 15, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.27$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.41$4.25
Coding index55.062.1
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 55.0 for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp when output tokens cost 10.4x less.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Muse Spark Open?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v3-2-exp-vs-meta-muse-spark-open" title="DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Muse Spark Open, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v3-2-exp-vs-meta-muse-spark-open">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Muse Spark Open</a></p>