Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Llama 4 Scout

DeepSeek V3.1 leads Llama 4 Scout on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 13.7 to 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout costs 3.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
9
Llama 4 ScoutMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
24.9
Output $/M
$0.50
0
vs boards won of 9 shared

DeepSeek V3.1 or Llama 4 Scout: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
9
DeepSeek V3.1 only
2
Llama 4 Scout only
73
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.1 not benchmarked, Llama 4 Scout not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 38.2 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: websites: DeepSeek V3.1 1122 against Llama 4 Scout 750, 46.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.1 $1.50 against Llama 4 Scout $0.50 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.1 takes 164K tokens, Llama 4 Scout 1.31M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1BarsLlama 4 ScoutTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
Web design50
General20
All shared boards90
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Llama 4 ScoutLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured9.1%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured8.2Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.9%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
SciCodeNot measured21.3%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured1.5%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1286Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1286Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Llama 4 ScoutLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.76.5DeepSeek V3.1
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured129.6Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Llama 4 ScoutLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.5Only Llama 4 Scout measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured15.5%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured28.1%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Llama 4 ScoutLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured47.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured58.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured58.7%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured51.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
ARC-AGINot measured0.5%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured0.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1266Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1235Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1293Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1125Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1148Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%36.9%DeepSeek V3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Llama 4 ScoutLeader
AIMENot measured19.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured79.2%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
AA Math IndexNot measured14.0Only Llama 4 Scout measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured7.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH level 5Not measured62.3%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1287Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1286Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Llama 4 ScoutLeader
MMLU ProNot measured69.6%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured46.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured55.2%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured57.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured50.9%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured23.3%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured75.2%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1278Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1275Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1285Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1257Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Llama 4 ScoutLeader
Design Arena: websites1122750DeepSeek V3.1
Design Arena: UI components1085765DeepSeek V3.1
Design Arena: game dev1084772DeepSeek V3.1
Design Arena: data viz1096896DeepSeek V3.1
Design Arena: 3D1077Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1112789DeepSeek V3.1
Design Arena: SVG967Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Llama 4 ScoutLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured34.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
IFBenchNot measured39.5%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured27.7%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
DTBench82.7%57.9%DeepSeek V3.1
LMCA24.3%12.0%DeepSeek V3.1
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured36.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena TextNot measured1279Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1248Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1249Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1118Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1304Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1252Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1255Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1273Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1206Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1207Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1283Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1278Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1263Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1265Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1280Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1265Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1269Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1242Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1143Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1106Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1117Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1102Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1126Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Llama 4 ScoutLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.0013Fits in one request
Llama 4 Scout$0.0004Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.032Fits in one request
Llama 4 Scout$0.010Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.125Exceeds the context window
Llama 4 Scout$0.040Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.1 and Llama 4 Scout
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.1Meta Llama 4 Scout
MakerDeepSeekMeta Llama
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 21, 2025April 5, 2025
Context window164K1.31M
Input $/Mtok$0.55$0.175
Output $/Mtok$1.50$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.276
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 better than Llama 4 Scout for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 or Llama 4 Scout?

DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.55 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Llama 4 Scout costs $0.175 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Scout only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout, with 1.31M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.1 vs Llama 4 Scout comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Llama 4 Scout's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next