Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A vs Hy3

Hy3 costs 18.9x less per output token than Command A ($0.528 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 32 benchmarks have a result for both.

Command ACohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Hy3Tencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.528
32
vs boards won of 32 shared

Command A or Hy3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Command A for work measured by SciCode or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
32
Command A only
30
Hy3 only
12
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A not benchmarked, Hy3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 28.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: math: Command A 1300 against Hy3 1473, 28.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command A $10.00 against Hy3 $0.528 per million output tokens, 18.9x apart.
Context window
Command A takes 256K tokens, Hy3 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand ABarsHy3Ties
Coding03
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General018
All shared boards032
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Command A and Hy3
BenchmarkCommand AHy3Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1507Only Hy3 measured
AA Coding Index27.8Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)7.8%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)17.6%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SciCode38.5%48.6%Hy3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
ALE-BenchNot measured838.6Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: coding13301466Hy3
LMArena Text: software and IT13361463Hy3
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1511Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1487Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A and Hy3
BenchmarkCommand AHy3Leader
AA Intelligence Index13.1Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A and Hy3
BenchmarkCommand AHy3Leader
AA Agentic Index1.0Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)9.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
τ²-Bench Telecom80.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)46.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A and Hy3
BenchmarkCommand AHy3Leader
GPQA Diamond48.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.1%89.7%Hy3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.0%33.5%Hy3
LMArena Text: hard prompts13261447Hy3
LMArena Text: expert12961461Hy3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13351455Hy3
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Command A and Hy3
BenchmarkCommand AHy3Leader
AIME13.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MGSM (Vals AI)85.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AA Math Index13.0Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)13.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMArena Text: math13001473Hy3
LMArena Text: mathematical work13121482Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A and Hy3
BenchmarkCommand AHy3Leader
MMLU Pro69.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)61.4%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedQA (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedCode (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMArena Text: science13391457Hy3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13341452Hy3
LMArena Text: legal and government13481422Hy3
LMArena Text: business and finance13151424Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command A and Hy3
BenchmarkCommand AHy3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1204Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1208Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1164Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1232Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1227Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1200Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1152Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Command A and Hy3
BenchmarkCommand AHy3Leader
MedScribe (Vals AI)55.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
IFBench73.9%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.7%79.0%Hy3
DTBench61.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMCA10.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMArena Text13311438Hy3
LMArena Text: instruction following13091426Hy3
LMArena Text: creative writing13191403Hy3
LMArena Text: English13441448Hy3
LMArena Text: non-English13131426Hy3
LMArena Text: Chinese13271485Hy3
LMArena Text: German13421449Hy3
LMArena Text: Japanese12851397Hy3
LMArena Text: Korean12851396Hy3
LMArena Text: French13511456Hy3
LMArena Text: Spanish13471457Hy3
LMArena Text: Russian13141432Hy3
LMArena Text: Polish13241447Hy3
LMArena Text: multi-turn13381436Hy3
LMArena Text: longer queries13341442Hy3
LMArena Text: writing and language13281414Hy3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13061400Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command A and Hy3
BenchmarkCommand AHy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A$0.0075Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0004Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A$0.155Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0082Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A$0.600Fits in one request
Hy3$0.032Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A and Hy3
SpecificationCohere Command ATencent Hy3
MakerCohereTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 13, 2025July 6, 2026
Context window256K262K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.132
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.528
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$2.69Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A better than Hy3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Command A for work measured by SciCode or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Command A or Hy3?

Command A costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Hy3 costs $0.132 and $0.528. Cost per solved task is known for Command A only.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A or Hy3?

Hy3, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks is the Command A vs Hy3 comparison based on?

32 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Command A's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Hy3's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next