Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Updated October 21, 2026. 39 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Command ACohere
Coding
No data
Overall
13.1
Output $/M
$10.00
8
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
11.9
Output $/M
$1.50
31
vs boards won of 39 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Command A has the edge where what matters is LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
39
Command A only
21
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B only
13
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 37.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Command A 80.7% against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 43.6%, 37.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command A $10.00 against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B $1.50 per million output tokens, 6.7x apart.
Context window
Command A takes 256K tokens, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand ABarsQwen3 Coder 480B A35BTies
Coding13
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning23
Math04
Knowledge05
General316
All shared boards831
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13
Coding benchmarks for Command A and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand AQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured69.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1275Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
AA Coding Index27.8Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)7.8%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)17.6%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.7%58.5%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
SciCode38.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.0%18.9%Command A
Terminal-BenchNot measured27.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
GSO-BenchNot measured4.9%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
WeirdMLNot measured41.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
ALE-BenchNot measured461.4Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: coding13301412Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: software and IT13361393Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1257Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1287Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand AQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.111.9Command A
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand AQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Agentic Index1.0Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)9.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
τ²-Bench Telecom80.7%43.6%Command A
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand AQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
GPQA Diamond48.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.1%61.8%Command A
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.0%4.5%Command A
LMArena Text: hard prompts13261372Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: expert12961338Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13351380Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for Command A and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand AQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AIME13.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MGSM (Vals AI)85.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AA Math Index13.039.3Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)13.0%39.3%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: math13001365Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: mathematical work13121367Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand AQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
MMLU Pro69.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)61.4%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedQA (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedCode (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.2%78.8%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: science13391347Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13341347Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: legal and government13481358Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: business and finance13151343Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command A and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand AQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1159Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1113Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1099Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1084Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1143Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index316
General benchmarks for Command A and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand AQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)55.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
IFBench73.9%40.5%Command A
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.7%45.7%Command A
DTBench61.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMCA10.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMArena Text13311357Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: instruction following13091355Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: creative writing13191333Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: English13441359Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: non-English13131346Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Chinese13271357Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: German13421325Command A
LMArena Text: Japanese12851311Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Korean12851305Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: French13511398Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Spanish13471360Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Russian13141366Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Polish13241344Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: multi-turn13381366Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: longer queries13341378Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: writing and language13281340Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13061317Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command A and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand AQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A$0.0075Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.0010Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A$0.155Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.019Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A$0.600Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.075Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
SpecificationCohere Command AQwen3 Coder 480B A35B
MakerCohereQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 13, 2025July 23, 2025
Context window256K262K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.30
Output $/Mtok$10.00$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$2.69Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command A has the edge where what matters is LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Command A costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs $0.30 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for Command A only.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks is the Command A vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comparison based on?

39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next