Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A vs GLM 5V Turbo

GLM 5V Turbo leads Command A on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 13.1, and GLM 5V Turbo costs 2.5x less per output token ($4.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.

Command ACohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
1
GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
33
vs boards won of 34 shared

Command A or GLM 5V Turbo: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Command A for a larger context window (256K against 203K tokens) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
34
Command A only
28
GLM 5V Turbo only
31
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A not benchmarked, GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 23.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Chinese: Command A 1327 against GLM 5V Turbo 1491, 27.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command A $10.00 against GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
Command A takes 256K tokens, GLM 5V Turbo 203K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand ABarsGLM 5V TurboTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General117
All shared boards133
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Command A and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 5V TurboLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1402Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
AA Coding Index27.8Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)7.8%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)17.6%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SciCode38.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.0%32.6%GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: coding13301466GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT13361460GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1386Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1425Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.123.5GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Agentic Index1.0Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1124Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1149Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1134Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1267Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured957Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1102Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1120Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1152Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)9.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
τ²-Bench Telecom80.7%98.5%GLM 5V Turbo
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)46.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 5V TurboLeader
GPQA Diamond48.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.1%80.9%GLM 5V Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.0%17.1%GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts13261443GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert12961453GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13351456GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1286Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1273Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Command A and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 5V TurboLeader
AIME13.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MGSM (Vals AI)85.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AA Math Index13.0Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)13.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMArena Text: math13001442GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work13121447GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 5V TurboLeader
MMLU Pro69.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)61.4%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedQA (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedCode (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMArena Text: science13391448GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13341433GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government13481436GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance13151435GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command A and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1213Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1219Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1202Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1209Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1228Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1151Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1117Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index117
General benchmarks for Command A and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 5V TurboLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)55.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
IFBench73.9%61.1%Command A
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.7%70.3%GLM 5V Turbo
DTBench61.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMCA10.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMArena Text13311437GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following13091423GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing13191417GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena VisionNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English13441454GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English13131420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese13271491GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German13421422GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Japanese1285Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMArena Text: Korean12851397GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: French13511443GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Spanish13471452GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian13141432GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish13241432GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: multi-turn13381431GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries13341438GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language13281420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13061407GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1274Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1329Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1268Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1241Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1252Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1416Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command A and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 5V TurboLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A$0.0075Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A$0.155Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A$0.600Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A and GLM 5V Turbo
SpecificationCohere Command AZ.ai GLM 5V Turbo
MakerCohereZ.ai
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 13, 2025April 1, 2026
Context window256K203K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$1.20
Output $/Mtok$10.00$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$2.69Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A better than GLM 5V Turbo for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Command A for a larger context window (256K against 203K tokens) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Command A or GLM 5V Turbo?

Command A costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for Command A only.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A or GLM 5V Turbo?

Command A, with 256K tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the Command A vs GLM 5V Turbo comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GLM 5V Turbo's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next