Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A vs GLM 4.5 Air

Command A leads GLM 4.5 Air on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 13.1 to 11.1, and GLM 4.5 Air costs 9.1x less per output token ($1.10 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 40 benchmarks have a result for both.

Command ACohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
7
GLM 4.5 AirZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
33
vs boards won of 40 shared

Command A or GLM 4.5 Air: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Command A for a larger context window (256K against 131K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
40
Command A only
22
GLM 4.5 Air only
8
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A not benchmarked, GLM 4.5 Air not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 41.3 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: Command A 13.0 against GLM 4.5 Air 80.7, 67.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command A $10.00 against GLM 4.5 Air $1.10 per million output tokens, 9.1x apart.
Context window
Command A takes 256K tokens, GLM 4.5 Air 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand ABarsGLM 4.5 AirTies
Coding13
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning24
Math04
Knowledge05
General217
All shared boards733
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13
Coding benchmarks for Command A and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 4.5 AirLeader
AA Coding Index27.8Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)7.8%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)17.6%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.7%68.4%GLM 4.5 Air
SciCode38.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.0%20.5%Command A
GSO-BenchNot measured2.9%Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: coding13301397GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: software and IT13361401GLM 4.5 Air
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 4.5 AirLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.111.1Command A
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 4.5 AirLeader
AA Agentic Index1.0Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)9.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
τ²-Bench Telecom80.7%46.5%Command A
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)46.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 4.5 AirLeader
GPQA Diamond48.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.1%73.3%Command A
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.0%7.0%Command A
LMArena Text: hard prompts13261379GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: expert12961370GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13351388GLM 4.5 Air
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%43.0%GLM 4.5 Air
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for Command A and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 4.5 AirLeader
AIME13.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MGSM (Vals AI)85.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AA Math Index13.080.7GLM 4.5 Air
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)13.0%80.7%GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: math13001396GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: mathematical work13121396GLM 4.5 Air
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 4.5 AirLeader
MMLU Pro69.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)61.4%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedQA (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedCode (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.2%81.5%GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: science13391407GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13341402GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: legal and government13481382GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: business and finance13151371GLM 4.5 Air
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command A and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 4.5 AirLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1146Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1123Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1094Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1186Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1123Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1137Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1071Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index217
General benchmarks for Command A and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 4.5 AirLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)55.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
IFBench73.9%37.6%Command A
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.7%46.7%Command A
DTBench61.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMCA10.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMArena Text13311384GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: instruction following13091354GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: creative writing13191343GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: English13441397GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: non-English13131366GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: Chinese13271426GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: German13421377GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: Japanese12851348GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: Korean12851308GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: French13511400GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: Spanish13471385GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: Russian13141373GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: Polish13241368GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: multi-turn13381371GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: longer queries13341366GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: writing and language13281354GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13061339GLM 4.5 Air
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command A and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkCommand AGLM 4.5 AirLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A$0.0075Fits in one request
GLM 4.5 Air$0.0008Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A$0.155Fits in one request
GLM 4.5 Air$0.013Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A$0.600Fits in one request
GLM 4.5 Air$0.051Exceeds the context window

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A and GLM 4.5 Air
SpecificationCohere Command AZ.ai GLM 4.5 Air
MakerCohereZ.ai
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 13, 2025July 25, 2025
Context window256K131K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.20
Output $/Mtok$10.00$1.10
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved task$2.69Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A better than GLM 4.5 Air for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Command A for a larger context window (256K against 131K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Command A or GLM 4.5 Air?

Command A costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.20 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for Command A only.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A or GLM 4.5 Air?

Command A, with 256K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Command A vs GLM 4.5 Air comparison based on?

40 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GLM 4.5 Air's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next