Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A+ vs Llama 4 Maverick

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Command A+Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
Llama 4 MaverickMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
9.3
Output $/M
$1.00
vs $1.50 vs $1.00 per 1M output tokens. Llama 4 Maverick is 1.5x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
0
Command A+ only
0
Llama 4 Maverick only
84
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A+ not benchmarked, Llama 4 Maverick not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
Command A+ $1.50 against Llama 4 Maverick $1.00 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
Command A+ takes 192K tokens, Llama 4 Maverick 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Command A+ and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkCommand A+Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured15.6%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured21.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured16.3Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured47.3%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SciCodeNot measured31.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.8%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
WeirdMLNot measured24.5%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
ALE-BenchNot measured173.0Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1301Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1299Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A+ and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkCommand A+Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured9.3Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured132.2Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A+ and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkCommand A+Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.6Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured17.8%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A+ and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkCommand A+Llama 4 MaverickLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured69.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured71.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured67.1%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
ARC-AGINot measured4.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured0.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SimpleBenchNot measured27.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1281Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1259Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1295Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1134Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1164Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Command A+ and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkCommand A+Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AIMENot measured25.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured85.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured92.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Math IndexNot measured19.3Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured19.3%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1299Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1295Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A+ and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkCommand A+Llama 4 MaverickLeader
MMLU ProNot measured79.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured77.8%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured49.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured66.6%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured58.5%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured36.5%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
GeoBenchNot measured52.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1288Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1275Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1286Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1260Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command A+ and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkCommand A+Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured871Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured899Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured838Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured882Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured901Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured880Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Command A+ and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkCommand A+Llama 4 MaverickLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured35.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured54.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
IFBenchNot measured43.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured50.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
DTBenchNot measured61.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMCANot measured15.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured46.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured62.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena TextNot measured1287Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1267Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1266Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1142Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1303Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1269Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1277Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1291Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1206Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1203Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1259Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1293Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1286Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1275Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1289Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1280Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1277Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1250Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1150Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1141Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1143Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1100Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1099Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command A+ and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkCommand A+Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A+$0.0010Fits in one request
Llama 4 Maverick$0.0008Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A+$0.019Fits in one request
Llama 4 Maverick$0.021Fits in one request

Command A+ costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A+$0.075Exceeds the context window
Llama 4 Maverick$0.080Fits in one request

Command A+ costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A+ and Llama 4 Maverick
SpecificationCohere Command A+Meta Llama 4 Maverick
MakerCohereMeta Llama
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026April 5, 2025
Context window192K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.35
Output $/Mtok$1.50$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.491
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A+ better than Llama 4 Maverick for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Llama 4 Maverick?

Command A+ costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.35 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Maverick only.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick, with 524K tokens against 192K.

How many benchmarks is the Command A+ vs Llama 4 Maverick comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A+'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Llama 4 Maverick's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next