Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Magnum v4 72B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs 12.5x less per output token than Magnum v4 72B ($0.40 vs $5.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

A Magnum v4 72BAnthracite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$5.00
Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.40
vs $5.00 vs $0.40 per 1M output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is 12.5x cheaper.

Magnum v4 72B or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Magnum v4 72B has none yet; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Magnum v4 72B not benchmarked, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Magnum v4 72B $5.00 against Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.40 per million output tokens, 12.5x apart.
Context window
Magnum v4 72B takes 33K tokens, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Magnum v4 72B and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkMagnum v4 72BGemini 2.5 Flash LiteLeader
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured71.4%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured59.3%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.5%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Magnum v4 72B and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkMagnum v4 72BGemini 2.5 Flash LiteLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured10.4Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured133.8Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Magnum v4 72B and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkMagnum v4 72BGemini 2.5 Flash LiteLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured19.0%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured36.9%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Magnum v4 72B and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkMagnum v4 72BGemini 2.5 Flash LiteLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured70.2%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured75.4%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured62.5%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.8%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured40.5%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Magnum v4 72B and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkMagnum v4 72BGemini 2.5 Flash LiteLeader
AIMENot measured42.1%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured89.5%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AA Math IndexNot measured53.3Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured53.3%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Magnum v4 72B and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkMagnum v4 72BGemini 2.5 Flash LiteLeader
MMLU ProNot measured79.1%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured57.6%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured66.2%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured57.6%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured34.2%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured75.9%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
General benchmarks for Magnum v4 72B and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkMagnum v4 72BGemini 2.5 Flash LiteLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured30.8%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured75.8%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
IFBenchNot measured49.9%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured55.7%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
DTBenchNot measured62.8%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMCANot measured18.1%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Magnum v4 72B$0.0050Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0003Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Magnum v4 72B$0.140Exceeds the context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0062Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Magnum v4 72B$0.550Exceeds the context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.024Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Magnum v4 72B and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
SpecificationMagnum v4 72BGoogle Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
MakerAnthraciteGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 22, 2024July 22, 2025
Context window33K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.10
Output $/Mtok$5.00$0.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Magnum v4 72B better than Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Magnum v4 72B or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?

Magnum v4 72B costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Magnum v4 72B or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.

Has any benchmark tested both Magnum v4 72B and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Magnum v4 72B has none yet; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next