Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova 2 Lite vs Llama 4 Scout

Nova 2 Lite leads Llama 4 Scout on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 13.4 to 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout costs 5.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 30 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nova 2 LiteAmazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
30
Llama 4 ScoutMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
24.9
Output $/M
$0.50
0
vs boards won of 30 shared

Nova 2 Lite or Llama 4 Scout: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
30
Nova 2 Lite only
1
Llama 4 Scout only
52
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova 2 Lite not benchmarked, Llama 4 Scout not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 17.4 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: expert: Nova 2 Lite 1359 against Llama 4 Scout 1235, 20.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova 2 Lite $2.50 against Llama 4 Scout $0.50 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Nova 2 Lite takes 1M tokens, Llama 4 Scout 1.31M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova 2 LiteBarsLlama 4 ScoutTies
Coding30
Intelligence10
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge40
General170
All shared boards300
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteLlama 4 ScoutLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured9.1%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
AA Coding Index23.08.2Nova 2 Lite
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.9%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
SciCodeNot measured21.3%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured1.5%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
ALE-Bench236.3Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: coding13851286Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: software and IT13941286Nova 2 Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteLlama 4 ScoutLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.46.5Nova 2 Lite
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured129.6Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteLlama 4 ScoutLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.5Only Llama 4 Scout measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured15.5%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured28.1%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteLlama 4 ScoutLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured47.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured58.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured58.7%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured51.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
ARC-AGINot measured0.5%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured0.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13641266Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: expert13591235Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13851293Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1125Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1148Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured36.9%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteLlama 4 ScoutLeader
AIMENot measured19.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured79.2%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
AA Math IndexNot measured14.0Only Llama 4 Scout measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured7.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH level 5Not measured62.3%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: math13591287Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: mathematical work13691286Nova 2 Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteLlama 4 ScoutLeader
MMLU ProNot measured69.6%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured46.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured55.2%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured57.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured50.9%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured23.3%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured75.2%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: science13821278Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13861275Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: legal and government13591285Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: business and finance13691257Nova 2 Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteLlama 4 ScoutLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured750Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured768Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured773Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured896Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured790Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteLlama 4 ScoutLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured34.8%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
IFBenchNot measured39.5%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured27.7%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
DTBenchNot measured57.9%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMCANot measured12.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured36.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text13621279Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: instruction following13351248Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: creative writing12921249Nova 2 Lite
LMArena VisionNot measured1118Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: English13851304Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: non-English13371252Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: Chinese13641255Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: German13431273Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: Japanese12731206Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: Korean12811207Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: French13811283Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: Spanish13751278Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: Russian13421263Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: Polish13271265Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: multi-turn13381280Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: longer queries13351265Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: writing and language13181269Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13091242Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1143Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1106Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1117Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1102Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1126Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteLlama 4 ScoutLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
Llama 4 Scout$0.0004Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.022Fits in one request
Llama 4 Scout$0.010Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.085Fits in one request
Llama 4 Scout$0.040Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova 2 Lite and Llama 4 Scout
SpecificationAmazon Nova 2 LiteMeta Llama 4 Scout
MakerAmazonMeta Llama
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 2, 2025April 5, 2025
Context window1M1.31M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.175
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.276
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova 2 Lite better than Llama 4 Scout for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Llama 4 Scout?

Nova 2 Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Llama 4 Scout costs $0.175 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Scout only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova 2 Lite or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout, with 1.31M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Nova 2 Lite vs Llama 4 Scout comparison based on?

30 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova 2 Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Llama 4 Scout's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next