Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Aion-2.0 vs Command A

Aion-2.0 costs 6.3x less per output token than Command A ($1.60 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

A Aion-2.0Aion Labs
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.60
Command ACohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
vs $1.60 vs $10.00 per 1M output tokens. Aion-2.0 is 6.3x cheaper.

Aion-2.0 or Command A: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Aion-2.0 for output tokens 6.3x cheaper ($1.60 vs $10.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Aion-2.0 has none yet; Command A on AA Coding Index, LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) and SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Aion-2.0 not benchmarked, Command A not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Aion-2.0 $1.60 against Command A $10.00 per million output tokens, 6.3x apart.
Context window
Aion-2.0 takes 131K tokens, Command A 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Aion-2.0 and Command A
BenchmarkAion-2.0Command ALeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured27.8Only Command A measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured35.1%Only Command A measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured7.8%Only Command A measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured17.6%Only Command A measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.7%Only Command A measured
SciCodeNot measured38.5%Only Command A measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.0%Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1330Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1336Only Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Aion-2.0 and Command A
BenchmarkAion-2.0Command ALeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured13.1Only Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Aion-2.0 and Command A
BenchmarkAion-2.0Command ALeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.0Only Command A measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured9.0%Only Command A measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured80.7%Only Command A measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured46.5%Only Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Aion-2.0 and Command A
BenchmarkAion-2.0Command ALeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured48.5%Only Command A measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured76.1%Only Command A measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured12.0%Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1326Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1296Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1335Only Command A measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured28.8%Only Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Aion-2.0 and Command A
BenchmarkAion-2.0Command ALeader
AIMENot measured13.3%Only Command A measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Command A measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured85.7%Only Command A measured
AA Math IndexNot measured13.0Only Command A measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.0%Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1300Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1312Only Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Aion-2.0 and Command A
BenchmarkAion-2.0Command ALeader
MMLU ProNot measured69.2%Only Command A measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only Command A measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured64.5%Only Command A measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured46.0%Only Command A measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured61.4%Only Command A measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured80.5%Only Command A measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured19.7%Only Command A measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured71.2%Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1339Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1334Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1348Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1315Only Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards measured
General benchmarks for Aion-2.0 and Command A
BenchmarkAion-2.0Command ALeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured55.7%Only Command A measured
IFBenchNot measured73.9%Only Command A measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured52.7%Only Command A measured
DTBenchNot measured61.3%Only Command A measured
LMCANot measured10.3%Only Command A measured
LMArena TextNot measured1331Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1309Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1319Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1344Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1313Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1327Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1342Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1285Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1285Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1351Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1347Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1314Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1324Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1338Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1334Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1328Only Command A measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1306Only Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Aion-2.0$0.0016Fits in one request
Command A$0.0075Fits in one request

Aion-2.0 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Aion-2.0$0.045Fits in one request
Command A$0.155Fits in one request

Aion-2.0 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Aion-2.0$0.176Exceeds the context window
Command A$0.600Fits in one request

Aion-2.0 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Aion-2.0 and Command A
SpecificationAionLabs Aion-2.0Cohere Command A
MakerAion LabsCohere
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 23, 2026March 13, 2025
Context window131K256K
Input $/Mtok$0.80$2.50
Output $/Mtok$1.60$10.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computable$2.69
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Aion-2.0 better than Command A for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Aion-2.0 for output tokens 6.3x cheaper ($1.60 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Aion-2.0 or Command A?

Aion-2.0 costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Command A costs $2.50 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for Command A only.

Which has the bigger context window, Aion-2.0 or Command A?

Command A, with 256K tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Aion-2.0 and Command A?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Aion-2.0 has none yet; Command A on AA Coding Index, LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) and SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next