Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Inkling 2 Small

Hy-MT2-1.8B costs 5.6x less per output token than Inkling 2 Small ($0.177 vs $1.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Hy-MT2-1.8BTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.177
T Inkling 2 SmallThinking Machines
Coding
48.9
Overall
56.9
Output $/M
$1.00
vs $0.177 vs $1.00 per 1M output tokens. Hy-MT2-1.8B is 5.6x cheaper.

Hy-MT2-1.8B or Inkling 2 Small: which to pick

Only Inkling 2 Small has a coding score, 48.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Hy-MT2-1.8B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Hy-MT2-1.8B for output tokens 5.6x cheaper ($0.177 vs $1.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Hy-MT2-1.8B has none yet; Inkling 2 Small on LMArena WebDev, Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Hy-MT2-1.8B not benchmarked, Inkling 2 Small 48.9 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Hy-MT2-1.8B $0.177 against Inkling 2 Small $1.00 per million output tokens, 5.6x apart.
Context window
Hy-MT2-1.8B takes 8K tokens, Inkling 2 Small 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index14 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Hy-MT2-1.8B and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkHy-MT2-1.8BInkling 2 SmallLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1647Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured12.6%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured81.5%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured43.1%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
SciCodeNot measured52.3%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.1%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
FrontierCode 2.0Not measured25.4%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1455Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1443Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1660Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1661Only Inkling 2 Small measured
SWE-Bench Pro V2Not measured97.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Hy-MT2-1.8B and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkHy-MT2-1.8BInkling 2 SmallLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured30.6Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Hy-MT2-1.8B and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkHy-MT2-1.8BInkling 2 SmallLeader
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured1.9%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.9%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured46.6%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured21.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured70.0%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured32.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured46.8%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
MCP AtlasNot measured85.4%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Hy-MT2-1.8B and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkHy-MT2-1.8BInkling 2 SmallLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured25.2%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured44.1%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.0%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
ARC-AGINot measured96.5%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured81.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1421Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1478Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1424Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Math benchmarks for Hy-MT2-1.8B and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkHy-MT2-1.8BInkling 2 SmallLeader
MathArenaNot measured42.4%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Hy-MT2-1.8B and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkHy-MT2-1.8BInkling 2 SmallLeader
AA-OmniscienceNot measured16.1Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1409Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1415Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards measured
General benchmarks for Hy-MT2-1.8B and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkHy-MT2-1.8BInkling 2 SmallLeader
Vals IndexNot measured56.1%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured88.6%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.3%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
GDPval-AANot measured1630Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena TextNot measured1403Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1408Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1348Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1418Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1390Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1377Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1408Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1403Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1381Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1359Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Hy-MT2-1.8B$0.0001Fits in one request
Inkling 2 Small$0.0008Fits in one request

Hy-MT2-1.8B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Hy-MT2-1.8B$0.0027Exceeds the context window
Inkling 2 Small$0.018Fits in one request

Hy-MT2-1.8B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Hy-MT2-1.8B$0.011Exceeds the context window
Inkling 2 Small$0.070Fits in one request

Hy-MT2-1.8B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Hy-MT2-1.8B and Inkling 2 Small
SpecificationTencent Hy-MT2-1.8BThinking Machines Inkling 2 Small
MakerTencentThinking Machines
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 20, 2026November 9, 2026
Context window8K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.044$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.177$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked48.9
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Hy-MT2-1.8B better than Inkling 2 Small for coding?

Only Inkling 2 Small has a coding score, 48.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Hy-MT2-1.8B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Hy-MT2-1.8B for output tokens 5.6x cheaper ($0.177 vs $1.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Hy-MT2-1.8B or Inkling 2 Small?

Hy-MT2-1.8B costs $0.044 per million input tokens and $0.177 per million output tokens; Inkling 2 Small costs $0.30 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Hy-MT2-1.8B or Inkling 2 Small?

Inkling 2 Small, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both Hy-MT2-1.8B and Inkling 2 Small?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Hy-MT2-1.8B has none yet; Inkling 2 Small on LMArena WebDev, Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of November 14, 2026.

Compare next