Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Step 5 Preview vs Palmyra X5

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
43.7
Output $/M
$2.70
W Palmyra X5Writer
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
vs $2.70 vs $6.00 per 1M output tokens. Step 5 Preview is 2.2x cheaper.

Decision reading

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Palmyra X5 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
0
Step 5 Preview only
61
Palmyra X5 only
0
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks, Palmyra X5 not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
Step 5 Preview $2.70 against Palmyra X5 $6.00 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
Context window
Step 5 Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Palmyra X5 1.04M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and Palmyra X5
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewPalmyra X5Leader
LiveBench coding85.6%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev1567Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)39.0%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)38.1%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)40.8%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
SciCode58.9%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding1485Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1473Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: React1583Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1556Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1550Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and Palmyra X5
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewPalmyra X5Leader
AA Intelligence Index43.7Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and Palmyra X5
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewPalmyra X5Leader
LiveBench research72.8%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browser24.0%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agentic27.5%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.4%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.7%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)27.3%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.4%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)57.1%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.4%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)2.9%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science Index29.6%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and Palmyra X5
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewPalmyra X5Leader
LiveBench reasoning83.8%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)18.5%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)46.5%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1461Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: expert1485Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1454Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1308Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homework1265Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and Palmyra X5
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewPalmyra X5Leader
ProofBench42.0%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: math1458Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1460Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and Palmyra X5
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewPalmyra X5Leader
LMArena Text: science1454Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1439Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1437Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and Palmyra X5
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewPalmyra X5Leader
LiveBench design76.9%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and Palmyra X5
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewPalmyra X5Leader
LiveBench data analysis63.5%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)58.1%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)88.3%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text1440Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1438Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1409Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision1265Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: English1447Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: non-English1428Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1500Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1383Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: French1438Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian1433Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1437Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1449Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1425Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1412Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: English1290Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1282Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and Palmyra X5
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewPalmyra X5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request
Palmyra X5$0.0036Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request
Palmyra X5$0.048Fits in one request

Palmyra X5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request
Palmyra X5$0.180Fits in one request

Palmyra X5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Step 5 Preview and Palmyra X5
SpecificationStepFun Step 5 PreviewWriter Palmyra X5
MakerStepFunWriter
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 8, 2026January 21, 2026
Context window1.05M1.04M
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.60
Output $/Mtok$2.70$6.00
Coding index61.1Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Step 5 Preview better than Palmyra X5 for coding?

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Palmyra X5 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Step 5 Preview or Palmyra X5?

Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $2.70 per million output tokens; Palmyra X5 costs $0.60 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Step 5 Preview or Palmyra X5?

Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 1.04M.

How many benchmarks is the Step 5 Preview vs Palmyra X5 comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Step 5 Preview's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Palmyra X5's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next