Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Step 5 Preview vs UnslopNemo 12B

UnslopNemo 12B costs 6.8x less per output token than Step 5 Preview ($0.40 vs $2.70 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
60.5
Output $/M
$2.70
T UnslopNemo 12BTheDrummer
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.40
vs $2.70 vs $0.40 per 1M output tokens. UnslopNemo 12B is 6.8x cheaper.

Step 5 Preview or UnslopNemo 12B: which to pick

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; UnslopNemo 12B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick UnslopNemo 12B for output tokens 6.8x cheaper ($0.40 vs $2.70 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Step 5 Preview has results on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI); UnslopNemo 12B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks, UnslopNemo 12B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Step 5 Preview $2.70 against UnslopNemo 12B $0.40 per million output tokens, 6.8x apart.
Context window
Step 5 Preview takes 1.05M tokens, UnslopNemo 12B 1.02M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and UnslopNemo 12B
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewUnslopNemo 12BLeader
LiveBench coding85.6%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev1567Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)39.0%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)38.1%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)40.8%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
SciCode58.9%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding1485Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1473Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: React1583Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1556Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1550Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and UnslopNemo 12B
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewUnslopNemo 12BLeader
AA Intelligence Index43.7Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and UnslopNemo 12B
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewUnslopNemo 12BLeader
LiveBench research72.8%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browser24.0%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agentic27.5%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.4%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.7%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)27.3%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.4%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)57.1%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.4%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)2.9%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science Index29.6%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and UnslopNemo 12B
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewUnslopNemo 12BLeader
LiveBench reasoning83.8%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)18.5%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)46.5%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1461Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: expert1485Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1454Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1308Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homework1265Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and UnslopNemo 12B
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewUnslopNemo 12BLeader
ProofBench42.0%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: math1458Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1460Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and UnslopNemo 12B
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewUnslopNemo 12BLeader
LMArena Text: science1454Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1439Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1437Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Web design benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and UnslopNemo 12B
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewUnslopNemo 12BLeader
LiveBench design76.9%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards measured
General benchmarks for Step 5 Preview and UnslopNemo 12B
BenchmarkStep 5 PreviewUnslopNemo 12BLeader
LiveBench data analysis63.5%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)58.1%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)88.3%Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text1440Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1438Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1409Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision1265Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: English1447Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: non-English1428Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1500Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1383Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: French1438Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian1433Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1437Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1449Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1425Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1412Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: English1290Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1282Not measuredOnly Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request
UnslopNemo 12B$0.0006Fits in one request

UnslopNemo 12B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request
UnslopNemo 12B$0.021Fits in one request

UnslopNemo 12B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request
UnslopNemo 12B$0.084Fits in one request

UnslopNemo 12B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Step 5 Preview and UnslopNemo 12B
SpecificationStepFun Step 5 PreviewTheDrummer UnslopNemo 12B
MakerStepFunTheDrummer
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 8, 2026November 8, 2024
Context window1.05M1.02M
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.40
Output $/Mtok$2.70$0.40
Coding index61.1Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Step 5 Preview better than UnslopNemo 12B for coding?

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; UnslopNemo 12B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick UnslopNemo 12B for output tokens 6.8x cheaper ($0.40 vs $2.70 per million).

Which is cheaper, Step 5 Preview or UnslopNemo 12B?

Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $2.70 per million output tokens; UnslopNemo 12B costs $0.40 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Step 5 Preview or UnslopNemo 12B?

Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 1.02M.

Has any benchmark tested both Step 5 Preview and UnslopNemo 12B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Step 5 Preview has results on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI); UnslopNemo 12B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next