Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Step 3.7 Flash vs Hy4

Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4 cost about the same per output token ($1.15 vs $1.2505 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 6 benchmarks have a result for both.

Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.15
0
Hy4Tencent
Coding
65.2
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.2505
6
vs boards won of 6 shared

Step 3.7 Flash or Hy4: which to pick

Only Hy4 has a coding score, 65.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Step 3.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Step 3.7 Flash for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($1.15 vs $1.2505 per million).

Shared results
6
Step 3.7 Flash only
14
Hy4 only
13
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Step 3.7 Flash not benchmarked, Hy4 65.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 19.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
GameBench 2: Step 3.7 Flash 29.4 against Hy4 48.7, 19.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Step 3.7 Flash $1.15 against Hy4 $1.2505 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Step 3.7 Flash takes 262K tokens, Hy4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryStep 3.7 FlashBarsHy4Ties
Coding01
Web design05
All shared boards06
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4Leader
AA Coding Index39.6Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured39.4%Only Hy4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured81.0%Only Hy4 measured
SciCode43.9%Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)35.6%Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured37.4%Only Hy4 measured
FrontierCode 2.0Not measured31.4%Only Hy4 measured
ALE-Bench694.1Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
GameBench 229.448.7Hy4
Terminal-Bench 4.0Not measured39.1%Only Hy4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured34.6Only Hy4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4Leader
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured34.4%Only Hy4 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured41.4%Only Hy4 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured12.5%Only Hy4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)21.4%Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured32.7%Only Hy4 measured
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.0%Only Hy4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Math benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4Leader
MathArena19.0%Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4Leader
AA-OmniscienceNot measured5.4Only Hy4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Web design benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4Leader
Design Arena: websites11861251Hy4
Design Arena: UI components11671197Hy4
Design Arena: game dev11421271Hy4
Design Arena: data viz1171Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D11081251Hy4
Design Arena: all code categories11691254Hy4
Design Arena: SVG1074Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1142Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4Leader
Vals IndexNot measured59.4%Only Hy4 measured
IFBench67.3%Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.7%Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
GDPval-AA864Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 45 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Step 3.7 Flash$0.0008Fits in one request
Hy4$0.0010Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Step 3.7 Flash$0.013Fits in one request
Hy4$0.025Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Step 3.7 Flash$0.051Fits in one request
Hy4$0.096Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4
SpecificationStepFun Step 3.7 FlashTencent Hy4
MakerStepFunTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2026November 4, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.417
Output $/Mtok$1.15$1.2505
Coding indexNot benchmarked65.2
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Step 3.7 Flash better than Hy4 for coding?

Only Hy4 has a coding score, 65.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Step 3.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Step 3.7 Flash for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($1.15 vs $1.2505 per million).

Which is cheaper, Step 3.7 Flash or Hy4?

Step 3.7 Flash costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.15 per million output tokens; Hy4 costs $0.417 and $1.2505. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Step 3.7 Flash or Hy4?

Hy4, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Step 3.7 Flash vs Hy4 comparison based on?

6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Step 3.7 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hy4's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next