Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.8 Flash vs Step 5 Preview

Qwen3.8 Flash costs 5.7x less per output token than Step 5 Preview ($0.47 vs $2.70 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.8 FlashQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.47
6
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
60.5
Output $/M
$2.70
1
vs boards won of 7 shared

Qwen3.8 Flash or Step 5 Preview: which to pick

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.8 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.8 Flash for output tokens 5.7x cheaper ($0.47 vs $2.70 per million) and work measured by LiveBench coding or LiveBench research, where it leads.

Shared results
7
Qwen3.8 Flash only
0
Step 5 Preview only
54
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.8 Flash not benchmarked, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 11.8 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveBench browser: Qwen3.8 Flash 48.0% against Step 5 Preview 24.0%, 24.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.8 Flash $0.47 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 5.7x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.8 Flash takes 1M tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.8 FlashBarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding10
Agentic work30
Reasoning10
Web design01
General10
All shared boards61
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.8 FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench coding87.4%85.6%Qwen3.8 Flash
LMArena WebDevNot measured1567Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SciCodeNot measured58.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1485Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1473Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1583Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1556Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1550Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.8 FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured43.7Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.8 FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench research74.6%72.8%Qwen3.8 Flash
LiveBench browser48.0%24.0%Qwen3.8 Flash
LiveBench long agentic37.1%27.5%Qwen3.8 Flash
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured27.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.8 FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench reasoning87.4%83.8%Qwen3.8 Flash
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured46.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1461Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1485Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1454Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1308Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.8 FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
ProofBenchNot measured42.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1458Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1460Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.8 FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1454Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1439Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1437Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1435Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.8 FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench design72.8%76.9%Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.8 FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysis74.2%63.5%Qwen3.8 Flash
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured88.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena TextNot measured1440Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1438Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1409Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1447Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1428Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1500Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1383Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1438Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1441Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1433Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1437Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1449Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1425Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1412Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1290Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1282Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.8 FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.8 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.8 Flash$0.0089Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.8 Flash$0.035Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.8 Flash and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationQwen3.8 FlashStepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerQwenStepFun
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 26, 2026October 8, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.00
Output $/Mtok$0.47$2.70
Coding indexNot benchmarked61.1
Independent measurements behind it14
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.8 Flash better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.8 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.8 Flash for output tokens 5.7x cheaper ($0.47 vs $2.70 per million) and work measured by LiveBench coding or LiveBench research, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Flash or Step 5 Preview?

Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.47 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.8 Flash or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.8 Flash vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.8 Flash's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next