Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Solar Pro 3
Solar Pro 3 costs 3.0x less per output token than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 ($0.60 vs $1.80 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- 39.5
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $1.80
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.60
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 or Solar Pro 3: which to pick
Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Solar Pro 3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Solar Pro 3 for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $1.80 per million).
No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has results on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI); Solar Pro 3 on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Solar Pro 3 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 7.8.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Solar Pro 3 has a AA Agentic Index result, 1.4.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a GPQA Diamond result, 87.4%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a AIME result, 86.0%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a MMLU Pro result, 87.2%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 takes 1M tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Solar Pro 3
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $0.0012, Solar Pro 3 $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has the number, $1.35.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks, Solar Pro 3 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 against Solar Pro 3 $0.60 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
- Context window
- Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 takes 1M tokens, Solar Pro 3 131K.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards measured
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 16.2 | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 85.3% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 71.2% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 15.7% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 25.5% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 7.6% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 608.9 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 7.8 | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.2 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 1.4 | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 86.3% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $1 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 22.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 72.4% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 10.3% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 84.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 8.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 17.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 86.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 86.7% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.2% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 85.1% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 59.7% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 65.3% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 60.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 95.2% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 25.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 30.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 71.2% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 32.3% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| DTBench | 80.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| LMCA | 36.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| CL-bench | 19.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| CL-bench Life | 12.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Solar Pro 3 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Solar Pro 3 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Solar Pro 3 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Upstage Solar Pro 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Qwen | Upstage |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | April 27, 2026 | January 27, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.80 | $0.60 |
| Coding index | 39.5 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.35 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 better than Solar Pro 3 for coding?
Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Solar Pro 3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Solar Pro 3 for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $1.80 per million).
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 or Solar Pro 3?
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; Solar Pro 3 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 or Solar Pro 3?
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, with 1M tokens against 131K.
Has any benchmark tested both Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 and Solar Pro 3?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has results on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI); Solar Pro 3 on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.