Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Step 3.7 Flash

Step 3.7 Flash costs 1.6x less per output token than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 ($1.15 vs $1.80 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen
Coding
39.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
0
Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.15
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 or Step 3.7 Flash: which to pick

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Step 3.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Step 3.7 Flash for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($1.15 vs $1.80 per million) and work measured by ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Shared results
1
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only
24
Step 3.7 Flash only
17
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks, Step 3.7 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 2.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 608.9 against Step 3.7 Flash 694.1, 2.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 against Step 3.7 Flash $1.15 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 takes 1M tokens, Step 3.7 Flash 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20BarsStep 3.7 FlashTies
Coding01
All shared boards01
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Step 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured39.6Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)71.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)15.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
SciCodeNot measured43.9%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.6%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
ALE-Bench608.9694.1Step 3.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Step 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured19.5Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Epoch Capabilities Index146.2Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Step 3.7 FlashLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured98.5%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$1Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Step 3.7 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond87.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)22.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.9%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured21.4%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)84.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Chess puzzles8.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Step 3.7 FlashLeader
AIME86.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
OTIS Mock AIME86.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Step 3.7 FlashLeader
MMLU Pro87.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)59.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)60.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)95.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
SimpleQA Verified25.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Step 3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1196Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1177Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1158Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1173Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1129Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1182Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1084Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1152Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Step 3.7 FlashLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)30.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
IFBenchNot measured67.3%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured73.7%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
DTBench80.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMCA36.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-bench19.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-bench Life12.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Step 3.7 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.0012Fits in one request
Step 3.7 Flash$0.0008Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.020Fits in one request
Step 3.7 Flash$0.013Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.078Fits in one request
Step 3.7 Flash$0.051Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 and Step 3.7 Flash
SpecificationQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
MakerQwenStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 27, 2026May 28, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.20
Output $/Mtok$1.80$1.15
Coding index39.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved task$1.35Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 better than Step 3.7 Flash for coding?

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Step 3.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Step 3.7 Flash for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($1.15 vs $1.80 per million) and work measured by ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 or Step 3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash costs $0.20 and $1.15. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 or Step 3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Step 3.7 Flash comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Step 3.7 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next