Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 cost about the same per output token ($1.56 vs $1.80 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.5-27BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.56
2
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen
Coding
39.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
2
vs boards won of 4 shared

Qwen3.5-27B or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: which to pick

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5-27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5-27B for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($1.56 vs $1.80 per million) and work measured by Vending-Bench 2 or DTBench, where it leads.

Shared results
4
Qwen3.5-27B only
50
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only
21
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5-27B not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 8.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: Qwen3.5-27B 349.4 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 608.9, 8.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5-27B $1.56 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.5-27B takes 262K tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5-27BBarsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Ties
Coding01
Agentic work10
General11
All shared boards22
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
LMArena WebDev1358Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
ALE-Bench349.4608.9Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
LMArena Text: coding1427Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1431Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena WebDev: React1346Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1386Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Intelligence Index22.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.2Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom93.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Vending-Bench 2$202$1Qwen3.5-27B
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured22.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)85.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured84.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1415Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: expert1427Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1429Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1249Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1256Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AIMENot measured86.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: math1429Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1429Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
MathArena15.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.1%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.3%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured60.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured95.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured25.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: science1437Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1425Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1405Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1399Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
IFBench75.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
DTBench82.4%80.5%Qwen3.5-27B
LMCA34.0%36.4%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
CL-benchNot measured19.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured12.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text1409Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1393Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1362Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision1241Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: English1425Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1390Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1478Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: German1392Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1346Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1359Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: French1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1407Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1390Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1375Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1413Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1380Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1363Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: English1246Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1301Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1246Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1227Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1170Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1210Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1224Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B$0.0010Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B$0.014Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B$0.055Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.078Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SpecificationQwen3.5-27BQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 25, 2026April 27, 2026
Context window262K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.195$0.30
Output $/Mtok$1.56$1.80
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.5
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5-27B better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding?

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5-27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5-27B for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($1.56 vs $1.80 per million) and work measured by Vending-Bench 2 or DTBench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-27B or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Qwen3.5-27B costs $0.195 per million input tokens and $1.56 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 and $1.80. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-27B or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.5-27B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next