Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs 4.5x less per output token than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 ($0.40 vs $1.80 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen2.5 72B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
26.5
Output $/M
$0.40
0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen
Coding
39.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
5
vs boards won of 5 shared

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: which to pick

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for output tokens 4.5x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.80 per million).

Shared results
5
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct only
48
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only
20
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 78.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 8.1% against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 86.7%, 78.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct $0.40 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 per million output tokens, 4.5x apart.
Context window
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct takes 33K tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen2.5 72B InstructBarsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Ties
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
Math01
General02
All shared boards05
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)27.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
WeirdML16.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
ALE-BenchNot measured608.9Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: coding1292Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1292Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.7Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Epoch Capabilities Index129.0146.2Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom34.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
METR time horizons35.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
BALROG16.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
TheAgentCompany5.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$1Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured22.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)49.1%84.8%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Chess puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
BIG-Bench Hard79.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1271Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expert1245Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1279Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AIMENot measured86.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
AA Math Index14.0Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME8.1%86.7%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MATH level 563.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math1283Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1290Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.1%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.3%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured60.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured95.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)72.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured25.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MMLU85.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning Challenge94.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1275Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1258Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1288Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1253Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
IFBench36.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
DTBench62.9%80.5%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
LMCA13.4%36.4%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
CL-benchNot measured19.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
HellaSwag84.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
WinoGrande82.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
PIQA82.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured12.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text1269Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1254Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1221Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English1283Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-English1252Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1273Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: German1234Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1180Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Korean1188Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: French1280Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1255Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian1264Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1272Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1281Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1247Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1211Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.019Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.076Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.078Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SpecificationQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 19, 2024April 27, 2026
Context window33K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.36$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.40$1.80
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.5
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding?

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for output tokens 4.5x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.80 per million).

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.36 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 and $1.80. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, with 1M tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next